Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh --skill analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh/analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh/analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh/analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh/analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh/analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.02929 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00031 | $0.01465 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00586 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00293 |
Grade A, and why
analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 258 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
使用 MITRE ATT&CK Navigator 分析 APT 组织
概述
MITRE ATT&CK Navigator 是一款基于 Web 的工具,用于标注和探索 ATT&CK 矩阵,使分析人员能够可视化威胁行为者(Threat Actor)的技术覆盖情况、比较多个 APT 组织、识别检测差距,并构建威胁导向防御策略。本技能涵盖通过编程方式查询 ATT&CK 数据、将 APT 组织的 TTP 映射到 Navigator 层、创建多层叠加进行差距分析,以及为检测工程团队生成可执行情报报告。
前置条件
- Python 3.9+,安装
attackcti、mitreattack-python、stix2、requests库 - ATT&CK Navigator (https://mitre-attack.github.io/attack-navigator/) 或本地部署版本
- 了解 ATT&CK Enterprise 矩阵:14 个战术、200+ 个技术及子技术
- 访问威胁情报报告或 MISP/OpenCTI 获取威胁行为者数据
- 熟悉 STIX 2.1 的 Intrusion Set 和 Attack Pattern 对象
核心概念
ATT&CK Navigator 层
Navigator 层是 JSON 文件,用于为 ATT&CK 技术添加分数、颜色、注释和元数据标注。每个层可以代表单个 APT 组织的技术使用情况、检测能力图谱或组合叠加层。4.5 版本层格式支持 enterprise-attack、mobile-attack 和 ics-attack 域,并可按平台(Windows、Linux、macOS、Cloud、Azure AD、Office 365、SaaS)进行过滤。
ATT&CK 中的 APT 组织画像
ATT&CK 收录了超过 140 个威胁组织及其记录在案的技术使用情况。每个组织画像包含别名、目标行业、关联攻击活动、所用软件及技术映射(含过程级详情)。组织通过 G 代码标识(如 APT29 为 G0016,APT28 为 G0007,Lazarus Group 为 G0032)。
多层分析
Navigator 支持同时加载多个层,使分析人员能够将威胁行为者的 TTP 叠加到检测覆盖范围上以识别差距,比较多个 APT 组织以发现值得优先处理的共同技术,并追踪技术覆盖随时间的变化。
实践步骤
步骤 1:查询 APT 组织的 ATT&CK 数据
from attackcti import attack_client
import json
lift = attack_client()
# 获取所有威胁组织
groups = lift.get_groups()
print(f"Total ATT&CK groups: {len(groups)}")
# 查找 APT29(Cozy Bear / Midnight Blizzard)
apt29 = next((g for g in groups if g.get('name') == 'APT29'), None)
if apt29:
print(f"Group: {apt29['name']}")
print(f"Aliases: {apt29.get('aliases', [])}")
print(f"Description: {apt29.get('description', '')[:300]}")
# 获取 APT29(G0016)使用的技术
techniques = lift.get_techniques_used_by_group("G0016")
print(f"APT29 uses {len(techniques)} techniques")
technique_map = {}
for tech in techniques:
tech_id = ""
for ref in tech.get("external_references", []):
if ref.get("source_name") == "mitre-attack":
tech_id = ref.get("external_id", "")
break
if tech_id:
tactics = [p.get("phase_name", "") for p in tech.get("kill_chain_phases", [])]
technique_map[tech_id] = {
"name": tech.get("name", ""),
"tactics": tactics,
"description": tech.get("description", "")[:500],
"platforms": tech.get("x_mitre_platforms", []),
"data_sources": tech.get("x_mitre_data_sources", []),
}
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 258 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 64167496caaa
analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator is a skill published in the GitHub repository killvxk/cybersecurity-skills-zh (44 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 2,929 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator
Query ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups' TTPs for detection-gap analysis. Use to compare threat-actor technique coverage, find gaps in detection engineering, or produce Navigator…
analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator
Use when analyze advanced persistent threat (APT) group techniques using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to create layered heatmaps of adversary TTPs for detection gap analysis and threat-informed defense. Use when analyzeing advanced persistent threat (apt) group techniques using mitre att&ck.
analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator
Analyze advanced persistent threat (APT) group techniques using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to create layered heatmaps of adversary TTPs for detection gap analysis and threat-informed defense.
analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator
Analyze advanced persistent threat (APT) group techniques using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to create layered heatmaps of adversary TTPs for detection gap analysis and threat-informed defense.
analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator
Analyze advanced persistent threat (APT) group techniques using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to create layered heatmaps of adversary TTPs for detection gap analysis and threat-informed defense.
analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator
Analyze advanced persistent threat (APT) group techniques using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to create layered heatmaps of adversary TTPs for detection gap analysis and threat-informed defense.