Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add killvxk/pm-skills-zh --skill competitive-battlecardgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/killvxk/pm-skills-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/killvxk/pm-skills-zh/competitive-battlecard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/killvxk/pm-skills-zh/competitive-battlecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/killvxk/pm-skills-zh/competitive-battlecard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/killvxk/pm-skills-zh/competitive-battlecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/killvxk/pm-skills-zh/competitive-battlecard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.00848 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00424 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
competitive-battlecard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
竞争作战卡
为特定竞争对手制作一份简洁、可直接用于销售的竞争作战卡。
背景
你正在为 $ARGUMENTS 制作竞争作战卡。
使用网络搜索调研竞争对手的当前产品、定价、定位和近期动态。如果用户提供了文件（功能清单、赢单/败单数据、销售通话记录），请先阅读这些材料。
操作指引
-
调研竞争对手（使用网络搜索）：
- 当前产品功能和产品线
- 定价层级和模式
- 目标市场和产品定位
- 近期产品发布或功能变化
- 已知优势和劣势
- 用户评价和口碑（G2、Capterra、Reddit）
-
按以下结构制作竞争作战卡：
公司概况
- 成立时间、总部、融资/营收（如为公开信息）
- 目标市场和 ICP（理想客户画像）
- 一句话定位
快速对比
能力维度 我们 他们 优势方 [功能领域 1] [我们的方案] [他们的方案] [我们/他们/持平] [功能领域 2] ... ... ... 定价 ... ... ... 支持服务 ... ... ... 我们的优势所在
- [优势 1]：[佐证材料或客户引言]
- [优势 2]：[他们所不具备的具体能力]
- [优势 3]：[更好的方案及理由]
他们的优势所在
- [他们的强项 1]：[我们的对位策略]
- [他们的强项 2]：[我们如何弥补这一差距]
常见异议与应对话术
客户说 如何回应 "竞争对手 X 有 [功能]" "[我们的替代方案及为何更适合他们]" "他们更便宜" "[价值框架：总拥有成本（TCO）、ROI、隐性成本]" "他们更成熟" "[我们的优势：速度、创新、专注度、支持服务]" 埋雷问题（Landmines）
引导潜在客户主动暴露竞争对手弱点的问题：
- "对你们团队而言，[我们擅长的领域] 有多重要？"
- "你们评估过 [他们所缺乏的具体能力] 吗？"
赢单/败单规律
- 我们倾向于赢单的情况：[规律]
- 我们倾向于败单的情况：[规律]
- 竞争商机中的关键差异化点：[能扭转局面的因素]
-
保持一目了然：销售代表需要在通话时随时查阅。请使用表格、加粗文字和简短的要点。
保存为 Markdown 格式。适配 Notion/Confluence 中的打印或分享需求。
延伸阅读
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 78 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A ef2ed59a136c
competitive-battlecard is a skill published in the GitHub repository killvxk/pm-skills-zh (159 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 848 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…