Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Kilo-Org/kilo-marketplace --skill mlflow-onboardinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kilo-Org/kilo-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kilo-org/kilo-marketplace/mlflow-onboarding)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kilo-org/kilo-marketplace/mlflow-onboarding"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kilo-org/kilo-marketplace/mlflow-onboarding/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kilo-org/kilo-marketplace/mlflow-onboarding"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kilo-org/kilo-marketplace/mlflow-onboarding.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00127 | $0.03051 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.01525 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00610 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00305 |
Grade A, and why
mlflow-onboarding scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- mlflow-onboarding — 95% identical, 42 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 253 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MLflow Onboarding
MLflow supports two broad use cases that require different onboarding paths:
- GenAI applications and agents: LLM-powered apps, chatbots, RAG pipelines, tool-calling agents. Key MLflow features include tracing for observability, evaluation with LLM judges, and prompt management, among others.
- Traditional ML / deep learning models: scikit-learn, PyTorch, TensorFlow, XGBoost, etc. Key MLflow features include experiment tracking (parameters, metrics, artifacts), model logging, and model deployment, among others.
Determining which use case applies is the first and most important step. The onboarding path, quickstart tutorials, and integration steps differ significantly between the two.
Step 1: Determine the Use Case
Before recommending tutorials or integration steps, determine which use case the user is working on. Use the signals below, checking them in order. If the signals are ambiguous or absent, you MUST ask the user directly.
Signal 1: Check the Codebase
Search the user's project for imports and usage patterns that indicate the use case:
GenAI indicators (any of these suggest GenAI):
- Imports from LLM client libraries:
openai,anthropic,google.generativeai,google.genai,langchain,langchain_openai,langgraph,llamaindex,litellm,autogen,crewai,dspy - Imports from MLflow GenAI modules:
mlflow.genai,mlflow.tracing,mlflow.openai,mlflow.langchain - Usage of chat completions, embeddings, or agent frameworks
- Prompt templates or prompt engineering code
Traditional ML indicators (any of these suggest ML):
- Imports from ML frameworks:
sklearn,torch,tensorflow,keras,xgboost,lightgbm,catboost,statsmodels,scipy - Imports from MLflow ML modules:
mlflow.sklearn,mlflow.pytorch,mlflow.tensorflow - Model training loops,
.fit()calls, hyperparameter tuning code - Dataset loading with tabular/image/time-series data
# Search for GenAI indicators
grep -rl --include='*.py' -E '(import openai|import anthropic|from langchain|from langgraph|import litellm|from mlflow\.genai|from mlflow\.tracing|mlflow\.openai|mlflow\.langchain|ChatCompletion|chat\.completions)' .
# Search for ML indicators
grep -rl --include='*.py' -E '(from sklearn|import torch|import tensorflow|import keras|import xgboost|import lightgbm|mlflow\.sklearn|mlflow\.pytorch|mlflow\.tensorflow|\.fit\()' .
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 253 lines · 127 tokens per session scan A 0027054f0cf9
mlflow-onboarding is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kilo-Org/kilo-marketplace (175 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 127 tokens to every session and 3,051 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
fs-notebook-tabs
A computer-science capstone: an on-device ML keyboard that predicts next words privately — problem, method, evaluation, and defense answers. Built as a decision-grade coursework defense deck for professor, defense committee.
implementing-llms-litgpt
Implements and trains LLMs using Lightning AI's LitGPT with 20+ pretrained architectures (Llama, Gemma, Phi, Qwen, Mistral). Use when need clean model implementations, educational understanding of architectures, or production fine-tuning with LoRA/QLoRA. Single-file implementations, no abstraction layers.
rwkv-architecture
RNN+Transformer hybrid with O(n) inference. Linear time, infinite context, no KV cache. Train like GPT (parallel), infer like RNN (sequential). Linux Foundation AI project. Production at Windows, Office, NeMo. RWKV-7 (March 2025). Models up to 14B parameters.
nanogpt
Educational GPT implementation in 300 lines. Reproduces GPT-2 (124M) on OpenWebText. Clean, hackable code for learning transformers. By Andrej Karpathy. Perfect for understanding GPT architecture from scratch. Train on Shakespeare (CPU) or OpenWebText (multi-GPU).
kaggle-learner
This skill should be used when the user asks to "learn from Kaggle", "study Kaggle solutions", "analyze Kaggle competitions", or mentions Kaggle competition URLs. Provides access to extracted knowledge from winning Kaggle solutions across NLP, CV, time series, tabular, and multimodal domains.
data-science-engineering-foundation
State, resume, reconstruction, job-lifecycle, transition, and flow-state mechanics for the Data Science and Engineering Coach. Loaded by the coach; not a user entry point.