Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kinamind/Psy-Skill-Hub --skill irb-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kinamind/Psy-Skill-HubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kinamind/psy-skill-hub/irb-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kinamind/psy-skill-hub/irb-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kinamind/psy-skill-hub/irb-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kinamind/psy-skill-hub/irb-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kinamind/psy-skill-hub/irb-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00341 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00170 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
irb-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
IRB Review
Purpose
Pre-review support for human-subjects scope checks, ethics review triage, and unanticipated-problem incident classification.
When to Use
- human-subjects scope check
- review pathway triage
- incident reporting triage
Instructions
- identify the project or incident context.
- check for interaction, intervention, identifiable private information, vulnerable groups, and sensitive topics.
- if incident-related, test whether it appears unexpected, related or possibly related, and increases risk.
- return a structured pre-review with uncertainties and next-step recommendations.
Output Format
- Scope check
- Review signals
- Open questions
- Next steps
Boundaries
- do not claim institutional approval, legal clearance, or final ethics determination
- do not replace local IRB, REC, EC, legal counsel, or compliance review
- present outputs as drafts, pre-review notes, or structured guidance
Escalation
If the user describes an emergency, active abuse, immediate danger, or asks for crisis intervention, stop the workflow and direct them to urgent human help and local emergency resources.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 55 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A e87fde2d7e14
irb-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository kinamind/Psy-Skill-Hub (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 341 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…