Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kinamind/Psy-Skill-Hub --skill risk-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kinamind/Psy-Skill-HubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kinamind/psy-skill-hub/risk-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kinamind/psy-skill-hub/risk-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kinamind/psy-skill-hub/risk-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kinamind/psy-skill-hub/risk-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kinamind/psy-skill-hub/risk-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00324 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00130 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
risk-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Risk Review
Purpose
Structured review of privacy, confidentiality, procedural, internet, and contextual risk in human-subjects research designs.
When to Use
- study risk assessment
- privacy and confidentiality review
- internet research risk review
Instructions
- extract study design details.
- assess privacy, confidentiality, procedural, internet, re-identification, group, and contextual risks.
- rate each concern qualitatively with explanation.
- suggest mitigations and language to include in protocol or consent materials.
Output Format
- Risk inventory
- Why it matters
- Mitigations
- Consent implications
Boundaries
- do not claim institutional approval, legal clearance, or final ethics determination
- do not replace local IRB, REC, EC, legal counsel, or compliance review
- present outputs as drafts, pre-review notes, or structured guidance
Escalation
If the user describes an emergency, active abuse, immediate danger, or asks for crisis intervention, stop the workflow and direct them to urgent human help and local emergency resources.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 8e002a74054e
risk-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository kinamind/Psy-Skill-Hub (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 324 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
terms-of-service
Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.