Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add KingGyuSuh/gemini-search-cc/plugin install geminiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kinggyusuh/gemini-search-cc/compare)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kinggyusuh/gemini-search-cc/compare"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kinggyusuh/gemini-search-cc/compare/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kinggyusuh/gemini-search-cc/compare"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kinggyusuh/gemini-search-cc/compare.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00381 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00191 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00076 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
compare scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Compare two technologies, frameworks, libraries, or tools using the Antigravity CLI's real-time grounded Google Search to provide current benchmarks, community sentiment, and recommendations.
Raw slash-command arguments:
$ARGUMENTS
Steps
-
If
$ARGUMENTSis empty or does not contain two items to compare, useAskUserQuestionto ask what technologies to compare. -
Run the companion script:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/gemini-companion.mjs" compare "$ARGUMENTS" -
If the command fails:
- Run
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/gemini-companion.mjs" setupto diagnose. - Suggest the user try
/gemini:searchfor a broader lookup.
- Run
-
Return the output verbatim.
-
After the results, provide a Comparison Verdict:
- Winner (for this use case): Technology A / Technology B / Depends on context
- Key Differentiator: The single most important distinction
- Recommendation: One sentence tailored to the user's current project context
Constraints
- Do not paraphrase the search output.
- Present both options fairly — do not show bias toward either technology.
- Focus on current data (2025-2026), not historical reputation.
- Include concrete metrics where available (bundle size, benchmark numbers, GitHub stars, npm downloads).
- Acknowledge when the comparison is context-dependent and no universal winner exists.
- Do not recommend based on personal preference — only on evidence from search results.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 41 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 4fa529afcf42
compare is a skill published in the GitHub repository KingGyuSuh/gemini-search-cc (3 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 381 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
notebook-kb
Use the notebook knowledge base (the local SQLite RAG /agy:notebook builds from a folder of documents) to do precise, grounded, cited work — total amounts by category, find every doc that mentions a person/organization, build a timeline, export a table — instead of re-reading prose and burning Claude's context.…
agy-prompting
Internal helper — how to tighten a user request into a sharp prompt for the Antigravity CLI (agy / Gemini 3.x with native web search and agentic tools).
provider-integration
Adds new AI providers to claude-council, configures provider API settings, troubleshoots provider connections, and documents the provider script interface. Covers creating provider shell scripts, setting API keys, and validating connectivity. Triggers on "add provider", "new AI agent", "provider not working", "API…
video-perception
Use when the user mentions a video file (.mp4, .mov, .avi, .mkv, .webm), a YouTube URL, asks to watch/analyze/review a video, or references video content in conversation.
librarium
Runs evidence-aware, multi-provider research with the Librarium v2 CLI. Use for deep research, competitive research, answer-engine visibility checks, or questions needing grounded multi-source coverage.
autosearch:channel-selection
Group-first channel selection algorithm for v2 tool-supplier architecture. Given a research query + clarify rubrics + channelpriority hints, picks 1-3 relevant groups from the router index, then 3-8 leaf channels from within those groups. Replaces flat-rank selection across 41 channels with a two-stage pick so runtime…