Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh --skill legal-research-authorshipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dshWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-authorship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-authorship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-authorship/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-authorship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-authorship.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.00733 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00040 | $0.00367 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
legal-research-authorship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
论文作者性与表达审查
开始前完整读取并遵守 ../legal-research/references/interaction-protocol.md，先解释当前步骤，结束时说明结果、作用和下一步，不向用户粘贴原始 JSON。
目标是让论文忠实呈现作者的材料、立场和推理，而不是模仿某种“人类文本”表面特征。开始前完整读取 references/authorship-protocol.md。
边界
- 不输出“AI生成概率”，不保证通过任何检测器，也不针对某个检测器调词。
- 不采用同义词轮换、故意错别字、虚构个人经历、伪造访谈或假造细节来掩饰文本来源。
- 不改变法律结论、规范立场、数据、引文含义和专业术语以换取所谓“低AI率”。
- 如果学校、期刊或机构要求披露AI辅助，提醒作者按适用规则如实披露。
工作流
- 读取全文、项目命题、证据台账和目标体例，区分来源事实、文献观点、作者推论、作者规范判断和待核内容。
- 建立
artifacts/author-decisions.md，记录四项必须由作者确认的内容：核心命题、规范立场、对最强反方的回应、研究局限。 - 逐段检查是否有新材料或新推理。只有复述提纲、重复结论或使用空泛过渡的段落应删除、合并或补证。
- 在不损害准确性的前提下调整句法和节奏。优先明确“谁依据什么作出何种判断”，保留必要法律术语。
- 对所有新增事实、数字、引语、判例评价和因果判断回到来源核验。无法核验时标记
[待核验]，不得用流畅表达掩盖证据缺口。 - 运行表面机械性扫描：
legal-research prose audit "{draft}" --json
- 对每条提示作语境判断，不机械全改。完成后登记作者决定文件与修订稿：
legal-research --workspace "{workspace}" artifact set --name author-decisions --path "{decisions}" --copy
legal-research --workspace "{workspace}" artifact set --name draft --path "{revised-draft}" --copy
- 转入
legal-research-review做来源、论证、方法和引注审查。
扫描器只识别预设的表面模式。低分不能证明文本由人撰写，高分也不能证明文本由AI生成。
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 47 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 361a3ae11e8f
legal-research-authorship is a skill published in the GitHub repository kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh (2 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 733 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
wechat-prohibited-word
A compliance checker for WeChat public-account content. It scans text, files, images, or web pages for restricted or sensitive wording and suggests safer replacements.
xiaohongshu-prohibited-word
A Xiaohongshu content checker that finds platform-prohibited or sensitive words in text, documents, images, and web pages. Xiaohongshu is a Chinese social platform with rules that can limit or reject posts containing certain terms.
contract-guardian
A contract-review workflow that checks agreements for risks, links important findings to relevant laws, and produces a written review. It covers common agreements such as sales, leases, loans, services, contracting, and intellectual property.
法律周报
A legal-news briefing workflow that finds recent court and legal-practice articles, scores them against selected criteria, and archives chosen items in a local Obsidian notes folder. Obsidian is a local note-taking application.
legal-research
A Chinese-language legal research workflow for finding laws, regulations, court cases, compensation standards, and legal grounds.
legal-citation-comprehensive
A Chinese and foreign legal-citation tool for checking, completing, explaining, and formatting footnotes under the second edition of a legal citation manual. It handles laws, cases, legal documents, and academic sources when the relevant source material is provided.