Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh --skill legal-research-citationsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dshWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-citations)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-citations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-citations/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-citations"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-citations.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00375 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00150 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
legal-research-citations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
法律引注核验
开始前完整读取并遵守 ../legal-research/references/interaction-protocol.md，先解释当前步骤，结束时说明结果、作用和下一步，不向用户粘贴原始 JSON。
先读取 references/citation-policy.md。体例转换必须在来源身份核验之后进行。
检查顺序
- 来源是否真实存在，当前拿到的是原文、可靠副本还是二手转述。
- 作者、标题、机构、法院、案号、日期、卷期和出版信息是否匹配。
- 引用命题能否由指定页码、段落或条文直接支持。
- 正文锚点、脚注范围、同前、短引和交叉引用是否清晰。
- 全文是否使用同一套体例，是否混用全角半角标点或不同案名格式。
缺少信息时写 [待补：页码]、[待核验：案号]，不要生成看似完整的假引注。运行 legal-research audit --strict 检查台账中的定位和核验状态。
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 20ac1955f089
legal-research-citations is a skill published in the GitHub repository kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 375 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
deslop
Audits and rewrites legal writing, professional documentation, and general text to follow plain English principles. Translates archaic legalese and eliminates verbose "AI slop" by enforcing active voice, subject-verb proximity, and concise phrasing (inspired by Bryan Garner, the SEC Plain English Handbook, Federal…
xiaohongshu-prohibited-word
A Xiaohongshu content checker that finds platform-prohibited or sensitive words in text, documents, images, and web pages. Xiaohongshu is a Chinese social platform with rules that can limit or reject posts containing certain terms.
wechat-prohibited-word
A compliance checker for WeChat public-account content. It scans text, files, images, or web pages for restricted or sensitive wording and suggests safer replacements.
format-monitoring-report
A formatting guide for turning already-approved legal-monitoring content into a DOCX or PDF report. It specifies a seven-section layout, blue labels, Times New Roman, footnotes, page numbers, and a final comparison table.
verifiable-legal-document
A Russian-language workflow for producing legal documents with claim identifiers, linked supporting passages, hashes, and validation reports.
matter-intake
A setup process for a new legal matter or research assignment. It turns an unstructured request into a defined question, scope, data classification, plan, sources, deadline, and completion criteria.