Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh --skill legal-research-providersgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dshWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-providers)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-providers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-providers/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-providers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh/legal-research-providers.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.00699 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00349 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
legal-research-providers scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
法律数据库接入
开始前完整读取并遵守 ../legal-research/references/interaction-protocol.md，先解释当前步骤，结束时说明结果、作用和下一步，不向用户粘贴原始 JSON。
统一处理第三方法律数据服务的鉴权边界、字段映射、去重和来源追溯。当前实现北大法宝，其他供应商通过同一Provider接口扩展。
基本规则
- 只使用用户已经取得授权的账号、Token和数据范围，不抓取网页，不绕过登录、付费墙、频率限制或合同条款。
- Token只进入环境变量或目标客户端的密钥管理机制，不写进Skill、代码、日志、研究台账或可提交配置。
- 供应商返回记录默认标记为
provider-record-unverified-against-origin。回到法条原文、裁判文书或论文原文核验后，才能把来源设为verified。 - 批量调用可能消耗额度。执行真实查询前说明调用范围；用户没有授权真实调用时，只生成配置模板或处理本地结果文件。
选择接入方式
- 对话式法规、法条、案例、案号和引文查询使用MCP。
- Community版允许用户自行运行供应商CLI，再把结构化JSON导入来源台账。自动调用、批量执行和断点续跑由Pro版提供。
- 已有导出JSON时直接导入，不重复请求外部服务。
先检查环境：
legal-research provider list --json
legal-research provider diagnose pkulaw --json
北大法宝
处理北大法宝时读取 references/pkulaw.md。生成不含真实Token的九服务MCP配置模板：
legal-research provider mcp-config pkulaw --output ./mcp.pkulaw.example.json
导入MCP或CLI保存的JSON：
legal-research --workspace "{workspace}" provider import pkulaw "{result.json}" --resource-type auto --json
导入完成后执行 legal-research-sources，核对来源身份、效力状态、原文链接和精确定位。Provider导入日志保存在 providers/{provider}/imports.jsonl，只记录文件哈希、数量、结果ID和时间，不保存Token。
回到原始法源核验后写回状态：
legal-research --workspace "{workspace}" source verify S0001 \
--locator "{original-source-url}" --notes "已核对标题、效力和引用位置" --json
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 59 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A de61a9137767
legal-research-providers is a skill published in the GitHub repository kingselyjoe/legal-research-dsh (2 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 699 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
wechat-prohibited-word
A compliance checker for WeChat public-account content. It scans text, files, images, or web pages for restricted or sensitive wording and suggests safer replacements.
xiaohongshu-prohibited-word
A Xiaohongshu content checker that finds platform-prohibited or sensitive words in text, documents, images, and web pages. Xiaohongshu is a Chinese social platform with rules that can limit or reject posts containing certain terms.
contract-guardian
A contract-review workflow that checks agreements for risks, links important findings to relevant laws, and produces a written review. It covers common agreements such as sales, leases, loans, services, contracting, and intellectual property.
法律周报
A legal-news briefing workflow that finds recent court and legal-practice articles, scores them against selected criteria, and archives chosen items in a local Obsidian notes folder. Obsidian is a local note-taking application.
legal-research
A Chinese-language legal research workflow for finding laws, regulations, court cases, compensation standards, and legal grounds.
legal-citation-comprehensive
A Chinese and foreign legal-citation tool for checking, completing, explaining, and formatting footnotes under the second edition of a legal citation manual. It handles laws, cases, legal documents, and academic sources when the relevant source material is provided.