Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain --skill constraint-programminggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chainWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain/constraint-programming)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain/constraint-programming"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain/constraint-programming/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain/constraint-programming"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain/constraint-programming.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.05806 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00052 | $0.02903 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00581 |
Grade A, and why
constraint-programming scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 835 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Constraint Programming
You are an expert in constraint programming for supply chain optimization. Your goal is to help solve complex combinatorial problems using constraint propagation, global constraints, and intelligent search strategies that excel where traditional MIP struggles.
Initial Assessment
Before applying constraint programming, understand:
-
Problem Characteristics
- Type? (scheduling, allocation, sequencing, assignment)
- Constraints complex or logical? (if-then, all-different, etc.)
- Variables: discrete domains?
- Many feasibility constraints vs. optimization?
-
Why Constraint Programming
- MIP formulation too weak?
- Scheduling with disjunctive resources?
- Complex logical constraints?
- Need to find feasible solution quickly?
-
Problem Size
- Number of variables?
- Domain sizes?
- Number of constraints?
- Time limit for solving?
-
Technical Environment
- CP solver available? (OR-Tools, Gecode, MiniZinc)
- Need integrated with other systems?
- Optimization or just feasibility?
Constraint Programming Fundamentals
Core Concepts
Variables: Decision variables with discrete domains
# Example: Variable x can take values 1, 2, or 3
x ∈ {1, 2, 3}
Constraints: Relations that must hold between variables
# Example: x + y ≤ 10
# Example: AllDifferent([x, y, z])
Propagation: Reduce variable domains based on constraints
# If x + y ≤ 10 and x = 8, then propagate y ≤ 2
Search: Systematic exploration with backtracking
# Try x = 1, check consistency, recurse
# If inconsistent, backtrack and try x = 2
Job Shop Scheduling with CP
Implementation with OR-Tools CP-SAT
from ortools.sat.python import cp_model
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from typing import List, Tuple, Dict
class CPJobShopScheduler:
"""
Job Shop Scheduling using Constraint Programming
Problem: Schedule jobs on machines minimizing makespan
Each job has sequence of operations on specific machines
"""
def __init__(self,
jobs: List[List[Tuple[int, int]]],
time_limit_seconds: int = 60):
"""
Initialize CP Job Shop Scheduler
jobs: list of jobs, each job is list of (machine, duration)
Example: [[(0, 3), (1, 2), (2, 2)], # Job 0
[(0, 2), (2, 1), (1, 4)]] # Job 1
"""
self.jobs = jobs
self.n_jobs = len(jobs)
self.n_machines = max(max(op[0] for op in job) for job in jobs) + 1
self.time_limit = time_limit_seconds
# CP model
self.model = cp_model.CpModel()
# Decision variables
self.job_starts = [] # [job][operation] -> start time variable
self.job_ends = [] # [job][operation] -> end time variable
self.job_intervals = [] # [job][operation] -> interval variable
self.makespan = None
self.solution = None
def build_model(self):
"""Build CP model for job shop scheduling"""
# Upper bound on time horizon
horizon = sum(duration for job in self.jobs
for machine, duration in job)
print(f"Building CP model...")
print(f"Jobs: {self.n_jobs}, Machines: {self.n_machines}")
print(f"Time Horizon: {horizon}")
# Create variables for each operation
for job_id, job in enumerate(self.jobs):
job_start_vars = []
job_end_vars = []
job_interval_vars = []
for op_id, (machine, duration) in enumerate(job):
# Suffix for variable names
suffix = f'_j{job_id}_o{op_id}_m{machine}'
# Start time variable
start_var = self.model.NewIntVar(0, horizon, f'start{suffix}')
# End time variable
end_var = self.model.NewIntVar(0, horizon, f'end{suffix}')
# Interval variable (start, duration, end)
interval_var = self.model.NewIntervalVar(
start_var, duration, end_var, f'interval{suffix}'
)
job_start_vars.append(start_var)
job_end_vars.append(end_var)
job_interval_vars.append(interval_var)
self.job_starts.append(job_start_vars)
self.job_ends.append(job_end_vars)
self.job_intervals.append(job_interval_vars)
# Precedence constraints: operations within job must be sequential
for job_id in range(self.n_jobs):
for op_id in range(len(self.jobs[job_id]) - 1):
self.model.Add(
self.job_ends[job_id][op_id] <=
self.job_starts[job_id][op_id + 1]
)
# Disjunctive constraints: operations on same machine cannot overlap
machine_to_intervals = [[] for _ in range(self.n_machines)]
for job_id, job in enumerate(self.jobs):
for op_id, (machine, duration) in enumerate(job):
machine_to_intervals[machine].append(
self.job_intervals[job_id][op_id]
)
# NoOverlap constraint for each machine
for machine in range(self.n_machines):
if machine_to_intervals[machine]:
self.model.AddNoOverlap(machine_to_intervals[machine])
# Objective: minimize makespan
self.makespan = self.model.NewIntVar(0, horizon, 'makespan')
# Makespan is max end time of all jobs
for job_id in range(self.n_jobs):
last_op_idx = len(self.jobs[job_id]) - 1
self.model.Add(
self.makespan >= self.job_ends[job_id][last_op_idx]
)
self.model.Minimize(self.makespan)
print("CP model built successfully!")
def solve(self) -> Dict:
"""
Solve the CP model
Returns: solution dictionary
"""
print(f"\nSolving with time limit: {self.time_limit}s...")
# Create solver
solver = cp_model.CpSolver()
solver.parameters.max_time_in_seconds = self.time_limit
# Optional: set number of workers for parallel solving
solver.parameters.num_search_workers = 8
# Solve
status = solver.Solve(self.model)
# Extract solution
if status == cp_model.OPTIMAL or status == cp_model.FEASIBLE:
print(f"\nSolution found!")
print(f"Status: {'OPTIMAL' if status == cp_model.OPTIMAL else 'FEASIBLE'}")
print(f"Makespan: {solver.Value(self.makespan)}")
print(f"Solve time: {solver.WallTime():.2f}s")
# Extract schedule
schedule = []
for job_id in range(self.n_jobs):
for op_id, (machine, duration) in enumerate(self.jobs[job_id]):
start = solver.Value(self.job_starts[job_id][op_id])
end = solver.Value(self.job_ends[job_id][op_id])
schedule.append({
'job': job_id,
'operation': op_id,
'machine': machine,
'start': start,
'end': end,
'duration': duration
})
self.solution = {
'status': 'OPTIMAL' if status == cp_model.OPTIMAL else 'FEASIBLE',
'makespan': solver.Value(self.makespan),
'schedule': schedule,
'solve_time': solver.WallTime(),
'lower_bound': solver.BestObjectiveBound(),
'gap': (solver.Value(self.makespan) - solver.BestObjectiveBound()) /
solver.Value(self.makespan) * 100
}
return self.solution
else:
print("No solution found!")
return {
'status': 'INFEASIBLE' if status == cp_model.INFEASIBLE else 'UNKNOWN',
'makespan': None,
'schedule': [],
'solve_time': solver.WallTime()
}
def plot_gantt(self):
"""Visualize schedule as Gantt chart"""
if not self.solution or not self.solution['schedule']:
print("No solution to visualize!")
return
schedule = self.solution['schedule']
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(14, 8))
colors = plt.cm.Set3(np.linspace(0, 1, self.n_jobs))
for task in schedule:
ax.barh(
task['machine'],
task['duration'],
left=task['start'],
height=0.6,
color=colors[task['job']],
edgecolor='black',
linewidth=1.5
)
# Add job label
ax.text(
task['start'] + task['duration'] / 2,
task['machine'],
f"J{task['job']}\nO{task['operation']}",
ha='center',
va='center',
fontsize=9,
fontweight='bold'
)
ax.set_xlabel('Time', fontsize=12)
ax.set_ylabel('Machine', fontsize=12)
ax.set_title(
f"Job Shop Schedule - Makespan: {self.solution['makespan']}",
fontsize=14
)
ax.set_yticks(range(self.n_machines))
ax.set_yticklabels([f'M{i}' for i in range(self.n_machines)])
ax.grid(True, axis='x', alpha=0.3)
# Legend
legend_elements = [
plt.Rectangle((0,0),1,1, fc=colors[i],
edgecolor='black', label=f'Job {i}')
for i in range(self.n_jobs)
]
ax.legend(handles=legend_elements, loc='upper right')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()
# Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Classic 6x6 job shop problem (Fisher and Thompson, 1963)
jobs = [
[(0, 1), (1, 3), (2, 6), (3, 7), (4, 3), (5, 6)],
[(1, 8), (0, 5), (2, 10), (4, 10), (5, 10), (3, 4)],
[(0, 5), (1, 4), (2, 8), (4, 9), (3, 1), (5, 7)],
[(1, 5), (0, 5), (2, 5), (3, 3), (4, 8), (5, 9)],
[(2, 9), (1, 3), (3, 5), (4, 4), (5, 3), (0, 1)],
[(1, 3), (2, 3), (4, 9), (3, 10), (5, 4), (0, 1)]
]
# Create scheduler
scheduler = CPJobShopScheduler(jobs, time_limit_seconds=30)
# Build and solve
scheduler.build_model()
result = scheduler.solve()
# Print results
if result['status'] in ['OPTIMAL', 'FEASIBLE']:
print(f"\nMakespan: {result['makespan']}")
print(f"Lower Bound: {result['lower_bound']}")
print(f"Gap: {result['gap']:.2f}%")
# Visualize
scheduler.plot_gantt()
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 835 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A f6d65bb5a4b1
constraint-programming is a skill published in the GitHub repository kishorkukreja/awesome-supply-chain (67 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 5,806 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…