Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/kivo360/omoios/webapp-testingnpx skills add kivo360/OmoiOS --skill webapp-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kivo360/OmoiOSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kivo360/omoios/webapp-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kivo360/omoios/webapp-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kivo360/omoios/webapp-testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00884 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00442 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00177 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
webapp-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to webapp-testing — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Web Application Testing
To test local web applications, write native Python Playwright scripts.
Helper Scripts Available:
scripts/with_server.py- Manages server lifecycle (supports multiple servers)
Always run scripts with --help first to see usage. DO NOT read the source until you try running the script first and find that a customized solution is abslutely necessary. These scripts can be very large and thus pollute your context window. They exist to be called directly as black-box scripts rather than ingested into your context window.
Decision Tree: Choosing Your Approach
User task → Is it static HTML?
├─ Yes → Read HTML file directly to identify selectors
│ ├─ Success → Write Playwright script using selectors
│ └─ Fails/Incomplete → Treat as dynamic (below)
│
└─ No (dynamic webapp) → Is the server already running?
├─ No → Run: python scripts/with_server.py --help
│ Then use the helper + write simplified Playwright script
│
└─ Yes → Reconnaissance-then-action:
1. Navigate and wait for networkidle
2. Take screenshot or inspect DOM
3. Identify selectors from rendered state
4. Execute actions with discovered selectors
Example: Using with_server.py
To start a server, run --help first, then use the helper:
Single server:
python scripts/with_server.py --server "npm run dev" --port 5173 -- python your_automation.py
Multiple servers (e.g., backend + frontend):
python scripts/with_server.py \
--server "cd backend && python server.py" --port 3000 \
--server "cd frontend && npm run dev" --port 5173 \
-- python your_automation.py
To create an automation script, include only Playwright logic (servers are managed automatically):
from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright
with sync_playwright() as p:
browser = p.chromium.launch(headless=True) # Always launch chromium in headless mode
page = browser.new_page()
page.goto('http://localhost:5173') # Server already running and ready
page.wait_for_load_state('networkidle') # CRITICAL: Wait for JS to execute
# ... your automation logic
browser.close()
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 96 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 51b7349e77ec
webapp-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository kivo360/OmoiOS (75 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 884 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to webapp-testing, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
self-awareness
Use when the user asks about Archie itself — what Archie is, how it works, what it can or cannot do, what agents or domains exist, how plugins work, how requests get handled, why something behaves a certain way, what integrations are available, or whether Archie can change itself. Triggers on phrases like "what can…
archie-e2e
Boot a live Archie instance from the current branch, drive E2E scenarios headlessly through the archie-debug MCP (nonce → createtask → waitfortask → approve), capture per-scenario evidence files, and tear down cleanly. Use for Forge Stage 4 QA, verifying a branch against a live instance, running the basic or edit-mode…
openspec-explore
Enter explore mode - a thinking partner for exploring ideas, investigating problems, and clarifying requirements. Use when the user wants to think through something before or during a change.
writing-plugins
Read this before authoring or substantially changing a plugin, agent, or skill for Archie. It's the conceptual playbook for building plugins that fit Archie's multi-agent, single-orchestrator model — what a plugin must respect, why every plugin usually needs an orchestrator-facing skill, and how to think about agents…
triggers
Set up, list, or manage triggers — persistent "do Y when X happens" rules. Use when someone asks Archie to do something on a schedule ("every weekday at 9am…", "every morning post…", "remind the channel weekly…"), to react to new messages in a channel ("whenever someone posts X in.
thread-conduct
Use before posting anywhere outside this task's own thread, or when deciding how much to post inside it. Covers keeping one task in one thread, what to do with a finding that belongs to another team, when a cross-channel post is allowed and how small it must be, how much traffic a thread should carry, and how to…