Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kks0488/vibe-codex --skill vc-agent-teamsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kks0488/vibe-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kks0488/vibe-codex/vc-agent-teams)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kks0488/vibe-codex/vc-agent-teams"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kks0488/vibe-codex/vc-agent-teams/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kks0488/vibe-codex/vc-agent-teams"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kks0488/vibe-codex/vc-agent-teams.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.00467 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00234 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00093 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
vc-agent-teams scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
VC Agent Teams
Purpose
Use vc teams when coordination state must survive a process or session boundary, or when an
inspectable local mailbox is itself a requirement.
For ordinary parallel exploration, testing, triage, or review inside one Codex session, use Codex's
built-in subagents. vc teams stores and validates messages; it does not spawn agents.
Workflow
- Decide whether persistence is truly required. If not, use built-in subagents.
- Create a narrowly named team.
- Add only the roles needed by the workflow.
- Send bounded tasks with expected outputs and scope.
- Match approval or shutdown responses by
requestId. - Read status and evidence before closing the team.
- Prune stale read messages and delete finished teams.
Commands
vc teams create --name release-audit --description "durable release coordination"
vc teams add-member --team release-audit --name reviewer --agent-type reviewer
vc teams send --team release-audit --type message --from team-lead --recipient reviewer --content "Review release evidence"
vc teams status --team release-audit
vc teams read --team release-audit --agent reviewer --unread
vc teams await --team release-audit --agent team-lead --request-id <id> --timeout-ms 15000 --json
vc teams prune --team release-audit --days 7
vc teams delete --name release-audit --force true
State is stored under ~/.vc/teams/{team-name} unless VC_TEAMS_DIR overrides the location.
Safety rules
- Treat mailbox content as local data that may contain project context; do not commit it.
- Prefer direct messages to broadcasts.
- Do not represent a queued mailbox message as completed agent work.
- Require a matching pending request for approval and shutdown responses.
- Use a timeout for waits and report timeouts honestly.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 50 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 7c41fcacf76a
vc-agent-teams is a skill published in the GitHub repository kks0488/vibe-codex (11 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 467 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
boss-advanced
Advanced Boss orchestration patterns — Agent Teams leadership, 6-section delegation template, Skill vs Agent conflict resolution, Guardian pattern, and AI-slop detection.
boss-briefing
Vault health check — workflow pattern analysis, profile sync, session gap recovery, persona rule proposals.
gstack-sprint
3-Phase Sprint workflow — design → execute → review with user interaction at decision points.
briefing-vault
Initialize, manage, and search the per-project .briefing/ vault. Obsidian-compatible persistent knowledge base.
maintain-codex-wiki
Maintain a review-first Markdown knowledge base for Codex practices with source provenance, engineering capture, citation-aware queries, explicit archive and promotion, and deterministic linting. Use when asked to capture a durable engineering lesson, ingest Codex research, query or archive what the repository knows…
orchestrate-engineering
Coordinate complex engineering work across bounded subagents while protecting the main context, preventing edit conflicts, and measuring whether delegation was worthwhile. Use when the user asks to delegate, parallelize, orchestrate, use subagents, fan out a review, or handle a large task with independent workstreams…