Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/klausfreiberufler/devflow-mcp/devflow-adr-compliancenpx skills add KlausFreiberufler/devflow-mcp --skill devflow-adr-compliancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KlausFreiberufler/devflow-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/klausfreiberufler/devflow-mcp/devflow-adr-compliance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/klausfreiberufler/devflow-mcp/devflow-adr-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/klausfreiberufler/devflow-mcp/devflow-adr-compliance.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01321 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00660 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00264 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00132 |
Grade A, and why
devflow-adr-compliance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: devflow-adr-compliance
Knowledge-Hook 6 implementation. Sister-skill to [[devflow-collision-acknowledged]] (Hook 1): together they close the loop — Hook 1 records which ADRs apply to a flow, Hook 6 verifies the implementation actually respects them.
When to use
Trigger this skill at review-time after the implementation is complete and a diff exists. The skill runs against accepted ADRs only; proposed/deprecated/superseded ADRs are not enforced.
Process
0. Snapshot accepted ADRs (before diff-matching)
Before you compare paths, see which ADRs you are being measured against:
adr_list({ status: 'accepted' })
Read each result's affects_paths and title — these are the globs that the backend will run your diff against. Knowing them up front lets you (a) judge override-reasons honestly, (b) catch ADRs whose intent extends beyond their globs, and (c) spot accepted ADRs that obviously cover the area but have empty affects_paths (drift signal — flag as a finding instead of letting the compliance-check silently pass).
1. Collect the changed-files list
Get the file diff between the feature branch and the integration target. Typical command:
git diff --name-only main...HEAD
Pass the resulting array as filesChanged to the backend.
2. Run the compliance check
POST /api/flows/:id/adr-compliance-findings
Body:
{
"filesChanged": ["backend/src/routes/widgets.js", "frontend/src/pages/X.tsx", ...]
}
Backend matches each path against every accepted ADR's affects_paths globs (minimatch-style: * within a segment, ** across segments, ? single char, escapes elsewhere). Each match becomes a row in flow_compliance_findings with severity='violation'. Re-running the endpoint clears prior findings and records the freshest set.
Response:
{
"data": {
"violations": <count>,
"compliant": <bool>,
"findings": [
{ id, adrId, adrDisplayId, adrTitle, filePath, severity, overrideReason, overridden, ... }
]
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 133 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 8c7fbf8da63b
devflow-adr-compliance is a skill published in the GitHub repository KlausFreiberufler/devflow-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,321 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
chronicle
Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…