Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add klh/speedy-claude --skill csharp-best-practicegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/klh/speedy-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/klh/speedy-claude/csharp-best-practice)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/klh/speedy-claude/csharp-best-practice"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/klh/speedy-claude/csharp-best-practice/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/klh/speedy-claude/csharp-best-practice"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/klh/speedy-claude/csharp-best-practice.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.00693 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00347 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
csharp-best-practice scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- sql-best-practice — 88% identical, 18 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
C# Best Practice
Use this skill to review or improve C# work using common ecosystem conventions instead of ad hoc local habits.
Intent Router
| Need | Load |
|---|---|
| core conventions, tooling defaults, and review checklist for C# | references/best-practices.md |
Quick Start
- Confirm the target version, dialect, runtime, framework, or vendor before recommending changes.
- Prefer existing project conventions when they are already enforced and internally consistent.
- Apply the default guidance in
references/best-practices.mdfor naming, structure, testing, and tooling. - Recommend the smallest change set that improves clarity, safety, and maintainability.
Workflow
- Identify the runtime, dialect, or host environment before making specific recommendations.
- Separate language-level guidance from framework-, vendor-, or platform-specific conventions.
- Prioritize correctness, readability, changeability, and operability before micro-optimizations.
- Note the automation path: formatter, linter, type checker, compiler flags, or test runner.
- Call out the highest-leverage refactors first instead of producing style-only churn.
Typical Focus Areas
- naming, layout, and public API clarity
- boundary handling, state management, and error paths
- dependency direction, module structure, and test seams
- tooling, CI checks, and repeatable local verification
- performance, portability, or safety constraints only when they materially affect the design
Outputs to Prefer
- summarize the governing constraints before detailed recommendations
- group findings by severity, maintenance impact, or migration effort
- recommend concrete edits, checks, or follow-up tests
- preserve externally visible behavior unless the request explicitly allows semantic changes
Common Requests
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 75 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A d03ff2b25855
csharp-best-practice is a skill published in the GitHub repository klh/speedy-claude (11 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 693 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-dotnet-performance
Scans .NET code for 50 performance anti-patterns across async, memory, strings, collections, LINQ, regex, serialization, and I/O with tiered severity classification. Use when analyzing .NET code for optimization opportunities, reviewing hot paths, or auditing allocation-heavy patterns.
code-review-csharp
Perform structured code reviews of C# source code covering naming conventions, performance, security, readability, and .NET best practices. Trigger phrases include "review this C# code", "check my C# for best practices", "analyze this C# class", "find issues in my C# code".
de-sloppify
Systematic code cleanup pipeline for .NET projects. Runs 7 ordered steps: formatting, unused usings, analyzer warnings, dead code removal, TODO resolution, sealed class audit, and CancellationToken propagation. Each step is verified independently with tests between phases. Load this skill when: "clean up"…
refactoring-csharp
Rename and refactor C# symbols in a .NET solution or multi-solution monorepo with a one-shot Roslyn CLI. Use when the user asks to rename a symbol, preview impact, update references across a solution, or refactor shared projects across several solutions.
resharper-clt
Use the free official JetBrains ReSharper Command Line Tools for .NET repositories. USE FOR: jb inspectcode; jb cleanupcode; stronger C# inspections, cleanup profiles, and CI-friendly JetBrains analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: replacing tests with inspection output; ad-hoc formatting-only work when the repo intentionally…
roslynator
Use the open-source free Roslynator analyzer packages and optional CLI for .NET. USE FOR: Roslynator.Analyzers setup; Roslynator CLI checks or cleanup; C# linting, static analysis, and code-fix automation. DO NOT USE FOR: overlapping analyzer packs with no consolidation plan; formatting-only work owned by another…