Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add klh/speedy-claude --skill testing-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/klh/speedy-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/klh/speedy-claude/testing-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/klh/speedy-claude/testing-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/klh/speedy-claude/testing-patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/klh/speedy-claude/testing-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/klh/speedy-claude/testing-patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01407 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00563 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00281 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00141 |
Grade A, and why
testing-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 263 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Patterns and Utilities
Testing Philosophy
Test-Driven Development (TDD):
- Write failing test FIRST
- Implement minimal code to pass
- Refactor after green
- Never write production code without a failing test
Behavior-Driven Testing:
- Test behavior, not implementation
- Focus on public APIs and business requirements
- Avoid testing implementation details
- Use descriptive test names that describe behavior
Factory Pattern:
- Create
getMockX(overrides?: Partial<X>)functions - Provide sensible defaults
- Allow overriding specific properties
- Keep tests DRY and maintainable
Test Utilities
Custom Render Function
Create a custom render that wraps components with required providers:
// src/utils/testUtils.tsx
import { render } from '@testing-library/react-native';
import { ThemeProvider } from './theme';
export const renderWithTheme = (ui: React.ReactElement) => {
return render(
<ThemeProvider>{ui}</ThemeProvider>
);
};
Usage:
import { renderWithTheme } from 'utils/testUtils';
import { screen } from '@testing-library/react-native';
it('should render component', () => {
renderWithTheme(<MyComponent />);
expect(screen.getByText('Hello')).toBeTruthy();
});
Factory Pattern
Component Props Factory
import { ComponentProps } from 'react';
const getMockMyComponentProps = (
overrides?: Partial<ComponentProps<typeof MyComponent>>
) => {
return {
title: 'Default Title',
count: 0,
onPress: jest.fn(),
isLoading: false,
...overrides,
};
};
// Usage in tests
it('should render with custom title', () => {
const props = getMockMyComponentProps({ title: 'Custom Title' });
renderWithTheme(<MyComponent {...props} />);
expect(screen.getByText('Custom Title')).toBeTruthy();
});
Data Factory
interface User {
id: string;
name: string;
email: string;
role: 'admin' | 'user';
}
const getMockUser = (overrides?: Partial<User>): User => {
return {
id: '123',
name: 'John Doe',
email: '[email protected]',
role: 'user',
...overrides,
};
};
// Usage
it('should display admin badge for admin users', () => {
const user = getMockUser({ role: 'admin' });
renderWithTheme(<UserCard user={user} />);
expect(screen.getByText('Admin')).toBeTruthy();
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines 44e731624aad
- 1mo ago First seen · 260 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 20ac6875fbbd
testing-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository klh/speedy-claude (11 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,407 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
rust-testing
Rust testing patterns including unit tests, integration tests, async testing, property-based testing, mocking, and coverage. Follows TDD methodology.
cpp-testing
Use only when writing/updating/fixing C++ tests, configuring GoogleTest/CTest, diagnosing failing or flaky tests, or adding coverage/sanitizers.
write-vibe-tests
Write or refactor Mistral Vibe tests with proper decoupling. Use when adding behavior coverage, testing ports/adapters, replacing brittle mocks, creating fakes, adding characterization tests before refactors, or changing tests under tests/ for vibe/core, vibe/cli, vibe/acp, tools, config, sessions, skills, hooks, MCP…
composing-matchers
Build compound Gomega assertions by combining matchers — And/SatisfyAll (all pass), Or/SatisfyAny (any pass), Not (negate), WithTransform to map the actual before matching, Satisfy for an ad-hoc predicate, HaveValue to dereference pointers/interfaces, HaveField for struct fields and method results, HaveEach for every…
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
spec-driven-tests
Rebuild a package's unit test suite around a behavior specification (SPEC.md) derived from the implementation, with every test citing a numbered rule ID. Use when asked to do a spec-driven test rebuild, write a SPEC.md for a package, repeat the state or store spec process (PRs.