Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/klimentij/klimkit/diagnosenpx skills add klimentij/klimkit --skill diagnosegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/klimentij/klimkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/klimentij/klimkit/diagnose)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/klimentij/klimkit/diagnose"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/klimentij/klimkit/diagnose.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00066 | $0.01643 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00822 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00329 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
diagnose scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
81% identical to diagnosing-bugs — 79 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 118 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Diagnose
A discipline for hard bugs. Skip phases only when explicitly justified.
When exploring the codebase, use the project's domain glossary to get a clear mental model of the relevant modules, and check ADRs in the area you're touching.
Phase 1 — Build a feedback loop
This is the skill. Everything else is mechanical. If you have a fast, deterministic, agent-runnable pass/fail signal for the bug, you will find the cause — bisection, hypothesis-testing, and instrumentation all just consume that signal. If you don't have one, no amount of staring at code will save you.
Spend disproportionate effort here. Be aggressive. Be creative. Refuse to give up.
Ways to construct one — try them in roughly this order
- Failing test at whatever seam reaches the bug — unit, integration, e2e.
- Curl / HTTP script against a running dev server.
- CLI invocation with a fixture input, diffing stdout against a known-good snapshot.
- Headless browser script (Playwright / Puppeteer) — drives the UI, asserts on DOM/console/network.
- Replay a captured trace. Save a real network request / payload / event log to disk; replay it through the code path in isolation.
- Throwaway harness. Spin up a minimal subset of the system (one service, mocked deps) that exercises the bug code path with a single function call.
- Property / fuzz loop. If the bug is "sometimes wrong output", run 1000 random inputs and look for the failure mode.
- Bisection harness. If the bug appeared between two known states (commit, dataset, version), automate "boot at state X, check, repeat" so you can
git bisect runit. - Differential loop. Run the same input through old-version vs new-version (or two configs) and diff outputs.
- HITL bash script. Last resort. If a human must click, drive them with
scripts/hitl-loop.template.shso the loop is still structured. Captured output feeds back to you.
Build the right feedback loop, and the bug is 90% fixed.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 118 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 28886402bbfa
diagnose is a skill published in the GitHub repository klimentij/klimkit (7 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 1,643 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 81% identical to diagnosing-bugs, differing in 79 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
happiness-skill
当用户问「怎么才能更幸福/为什么得到了还不满足/怎么减少焦虑」时调用。 核心理念: 幸福是缺憾感清空的默认状态, 是可训练的技能; 欲望是与自己的契约(得到前不快乐), 同时只留一个重大欲望; 活在当下。 不适用于: 临床抑郁等需要专业治疗的场景(本书方法不能替代医疗)。 Triggers: 幸福/不快乐/欲望/焦虑/知足/活在当下/happiness/desire/anxiety.
agr-cli
Install, share, sync, and create AI agent skills across coding tools (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode, Copilot, Pi) using the agr CLI. Use whenever the user mentions agr, agr.toml, agr.lock, agrx, or asks to: add a skill ("install the pdf skill", "agr add ..."), sync agent resources across tools, share skills…
agr-release
Release process for the agr package. Handles version bumping (major/minor/patch/beta), changelog updates, pre-release quality checks, git tagging, and monitoring the GitHub Actions publish pipeline. Use this skill whenever the user wants to cut a release, bump the version, publish to PyPI, or asks about the release…
linkedin-post
You take a YouTube video transcript and produce a single LinkedIn post draft.
kafka-dlq-review
Review dead letter queue implementations for completeness using the Lenses MCP server. Checks DLQ topic existence, configuration, monitoring, metadata preservation, retry logic, reprocessing paths and connector DLQ alignment. Use when user says "review dead letter queues", "check DLQ setup", "DLQ audit" or asks about…
kafka-consumer-lag
Analyse Kafka consumer group lag using the Lenses MCP server. Diagnoses lag causes (throughput bottlenecks, rebalancing, partition skew, stalled consumers) and suggests remediation. Use when user says "check consumer lag", "why are consumers slow", "lag report" or asks about consumer group health or offset progress.…