request-refactor-plan

A guided process for planning a large code cleanup or redesign and recording the plan as a GitHub issue. It breaks the work into small commits, meaning changes that can be reviewed and tested separately.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to investigate a refactor, discuss alternatives, check existing test coverage, agree on what will and will not change, and create an incremental implementation plan.
Why use it?
It helps define the scope, compare possible approaches, and expose missing tests before refactoring begins. Small steps make the work easier to review and safer to merge.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/klimentij/klimkit/request-refactor-plan
Any agent
npx skills add klimentij/klimkit --skill request-refactor-plan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/klimentij/klimkit

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 53 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 555 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 88% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00053 $0.00555
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00278
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00111
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00056

Measured 3d ago against content hash d59de4ba6cc1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

request-refactor-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

88% identical to request-refactor-plan — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

third_party/mattpocock-skills/skills/deprecated/request-refactor-plan/SKILL.md · 69 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

This skill will be invoked when the user wants to create a refactor request. You should go through the steps below. You may skip steps if you don't consider them necessary.

  1. Ask the user for a long, detailed description of the problem they want to solve and any potential ideas for solutions.

  2. Explore the repo to verify their assertions and understand the current state of the codebase.

  3. Ask whether they have considered other options, and present other options to them.

  4. Interview the user about the implementation. Be extremely detailed and thorough.

  5. Hammer out the exact scope of the implementation. Work out what you plan to change and what you plan not to change.

  6. Look in the codebase to check for test coverage of this area of the codebase. If there is insufficient test coverage, ask the user what their plans for testing are.

  7. Break the implementation into a plan of tiny commits. Remember Martin Fowler's advice to "make each refactoring step as small as possible, so that you can always see the program working."

  8. Create a GitHub issue with the refactor plan. Use the following template for the issue description:

Problem Statement

The problem that the developer is facing, from the developer's perspective.

Solution

The solution to the problem, from the developer's perspective.

Commits

A LONG, detailed implementation plan. Write the plan in plain English, breaking down the implementation into the tiniest commits possible. Each commit should leave the codebase in a working state.

Decision Document

A list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include:

  • The modules that will be built/modified
  • The interfaces of those modules that will be modified
  • Technical clarifications from the developer
  • Architectural decisions
  • Schema changes
  • API contracts
  • Specific interactions

Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly.

Testing Decisions

Read the full file on GitHub · 69 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 69 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A d59de4ba6cc1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

request-refactor-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository klimentij/klimkit (7 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 555 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to request-refactor-plan, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

happiness-skill

当用户问「怎么才能更幸福/为什么得到了还不满足/怎么减少焦虑」时调用。 核心理念: 幸福是缺憾感清空的默认状态, 是可训练的技能; 欲望是与自己的契约(得到前不快乐), 同时只留一个重大欲望; 活在当下。 不适用于: 临床抑郁等需要专业治疗的场景(本书方法不能替代医疗)。 Triggers: 幸福/不快乐/欲望/焦虑/知足/活在当下/happiness/desire/anxiety.

kangarooking/cangjie-skill · 136 tokens

agr-cli

Install, share, sync, and create AI agent skills across coding tools (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode, Copilot, Pi) using the agr CLI. Use whenever the user mentions agr, agr.toml, agr.lock, agrx, or asks to: add a skill ("install the pdf skill", "agr add ..."), sync agent resources across tools, share skills…

computerlovetech/agr · 147 tokens

agr-release

Release process for the agr package. Handles version bumping (major/minor/patch/beta), changelog updates, pre-release quality checks, git tagging, and monitoring the GitHub Actions publish pipeline. Use this skill whenever the user wants to cut a release, bump the version, publish to PyPI, or asks about the release…

computerlovetech/agr · 91 tokens

hook-craft

Specializes in chapter openings (hooks) and chapter endings (pulls). Every chapter must start with a reason to keep reading and end with a reason to turn the page. Runs after prose-craft, before chaos-engine. The skill that prevents the reader from putting the book down.

felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4 · 61 tokens

kafka-topic-audit

Audit all Kafka topic configurations against production best practices using the Lenses MCP server. Checks replication factor, retention, partitions, compaction, naming conventions, orphaned topics and missing metadata. Use when user says "audit my topics", "check topic configs", "topic health check" or asks about…

lensesio/agentic-engineering-for-apache-kafka · 83 tokens

book-genesis

Use when the user wants to create, plan, draft, evaluate, revise, package, or run a complete AI-assisted book pipeline. Book Genesis turns a one-line idea into a book project with intake, foundation, architecture, drafting, adversarial audit, Genesis Score, and editorial package artifacts.

felipelobomotta-blip/book-genesis-v4 · 63 tokens