Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to kodustech/kodus-ai. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kodustech/kodus-ai/main/.claude/skills/kodus-sso-e2e/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kodustech/kodus-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kodustech/kodus-ai/kodus-sso-e2e)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kodustech/kodus-ai/kodus-sso-e2e"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kodustech/kodus-ai/kodus-sso-e2e/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kodustech/kodus-ai/kodus-sso-e2e"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kodustech/kodus-ai/kodus-sso-e2e.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00147 | $0.02484 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00059 | $0.00994 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00497 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00248 |
Grade D, and why
kodus-sso-e2e scanned grade D with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks for rootmediumPrivilege escalation
A mod that escalates privileges can change anything on the machine, not only the project.
- CI: this skill needs sudo for mkcert and (optionally) a browser. Not Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
rm -rf .tmp/sso-e2e-* The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago Changed 87e1eb99b4fc
- 2mo ago First seen · 226 lines · 147 tokens per session scan D a2c60b8f2e7a
kodus-sso-e2e is a skill published in the GitHub repository kodustech/kodus-ai (1,539 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 147 tokens to every session and 2,484 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it D with 2 findings (asks for root, recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
vet
Run vet immediately after ANY logical unit of code changes. Do not batch your changes, do not wait to be asked to run vet, make sure you are proactive.
Vitest Mock Isolation Review
Detects Vitest test-isolation hazards: unrestored vi.spyOn/vi.mock without afterEach cleanup or restoreMocks config, un-awaited resolves/rejects assertions, and shared mutable module state across tests.
code-review
Reviews code for bugs, security issues, and best practices.
adversarial-reviewer
Stress-test a code change for concrete correctness defects, unsafe assumptions, and failure modes. Use when the user explicitly asks for an adversarial review, a deep bug hunt, or to tear a change apart, or to check your own change before submitting it. Do not use for ordinary review, style feedback, or general…
trace
Use when encountering bugs, test failures, runtime errors, broken builds, or "this doesn't work" reports. Systematic root-cause analysis before any patch — never blind-patches symptoms. Standalone, ends with a final-integration review of the fix. Trigger with /hyperflow:trace, "debug this", "find the root cause", "why…
skeptic
Adversarial code reviewer for Bug Hunter. Rigorously challenges each reported bug to determine if it's real or a false positive. Uses doc-lookup (Context Hub + Context7) to verify framework claims before disproval. The immune system that kills false positives.