Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to koljaschoepe/scientific-writing. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/main/.claude/skills/pruefen/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/koljaschoepe/scientific-writingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/pruefen)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/pruefen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/pruefen/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/pruefen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/pruefen.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.01169 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00468 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00234 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
pruefen scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/pruefen: Qualität sichern
Wichtig: Prüfer vergleichen mit dem Original, nie mit der Paraphrase. Jeder Prüfer schreibt
seine Fundliste selbst und gibt nur eine Zeile zurück. Kapiteltext und Fundtabellen liest das
Hauptgespräch nicht. Status: nach der Prüfung geprueft, final nur danach und nur mit
Zustimmung der Person. Endausgabe laut AGENTS.md.
Argument: $ARGUMENTS: Kapitelnummer (2.1), Hauptkapitel (2), alles oder final.
Bei final: pruefen/final.md lesen und befolgen, hier aufhören.
Kontext laden
node .claude/kit/werkzeuge/zustand.mjs zeige (Kapitel, Status, Seiten Ist/Ziel),
.arbeit/einstellungen.md (Fachprofil, technik.abo). Prüfbar sind Kapitel ab entwurf.
Umfang und Prüfer wählen
Ohne Argument Interview „Was soll ich prüfen?“ header „Umfang“: „ (Empfohlen)“, „Ganzes Hauptkapitel “, „Die ganze Arbeit“ (teuer, Kapitel einzeln ist sparsamer), „Abgabe-Check“ (final).
Dann „Welche Prüfungen?“ header „Prüfer“, multiSelect. Empfohlen sind Zitattreue, Argumentation und Sprache, Fachliches nur bei Fachprofil Naturwissenschaft oder Technik in Methoden-, Ergebnis- und Diskussionskapiteln: „Zitattreue (Empfohlen)“, „Argumentation und Note (Empfohlen)“, „Sprache (Empfohlen)“, „Fachliches“ (dort mit „(Empfohlen)“, wo es passt).
Prüfen
Je Kapitel die gewählten Subagents pruefer-zitate, pruefer-argumentation,
pruefer-sprache, pruefer-fach. Auftrag: Kapitelnummer, Dateipfad, Seiten Ist/Ziel. Bei
technik.abo: pro höchstens zwei gleichzeitig. Jeder schreibt
.arbeit/pruefung/pruefung-<nr>-<zitate|argumentation|sprache|fach>.md und antwortet mit
einer Zeile.
Aus den Zeilen die Sammeldatei .arbeit/pruefung/pruefung-<nr>.md schreiben, ohne die
Einzeldateien zu lesen:
# Prüfung <nr> · <YYYY-MM-DD>
Notenschätzung: <Argumentation> · Sprache <x> · Fach <y>
Funde: hoch <a>, mittel <b>, niedrig <c>
Umfang: <Ist> von <Ziel> Seiten (<+/-%>)
## Die drei wichtigsten Punkte
1. ...
## Einzelberichte
- [Zitate](pruefung-<nr>-zitate.md) · [Argumentation](...) · [Sprache](...) · [Fach](...)
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago Changed · -2 lines · +10 tokens per session d52fd46e71ed
- 28d ago First seen · 92 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A a5e20207eae6
pruefen is a skill published in the GitHub repository koljaschoepe/scientific-writing (13 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 1,169 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
ml-paper-writing
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, reviewer guidelines, and citation verification workflows.
academic-plotting
Generates publication-quality figures for ML papers from research context. Given a paper section or description, extracts system components and relationships to generate architecture diagrams via Gemini. Given experiment results or data, auto-selects chart type and generates data-driven figures via matplotlib/seaborn.…
systems-paper-writing
Comprehensive guide for writing systems papers targeting OSDI, SOSP, ASPLOS, NSDI, and EuroSys. Provides paragraph-level structural blueprints, writing patterns, venue-specific checklists, reviewer guidelines, LaTeX templates, and conference deadlines. Use this skill for all systems conference paper writing.
overleaf
Sync and manage Overleaf LaTeX projects from the command line. Pull projects locally, push changes back, compile PDFs, and download compile outputs like .bbl files for arXiv submissions. Use when working with LaTeX, Overleaf, academic papers, or arXiv.
paper-skill
End-to-end, Chinese-first academic research and publication workflow for reading papers, literature reviews, research framing, manuscript planning and writing, the eight-step paper-system workflow, Chinese-English translation, LaTeX, figures, citation verification, reporting-guideline checks, journal selection, peer…
parallel-subagents
When a task decomposes into independent slices — separate files, OR separate sections of ONE file — fan it out: write job files to the subagent queue and the host runs real parallel Codex workers for you. For a single file, extract per-section slice files into the queue's work/ zone, let workers polish them in…