Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kolodkin/devpowers --skill check-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kolodkin/devpowersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kolodkin/devpowers/check-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kolodkin/devpowers/check-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kolodkin/devpowers/check-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kolodkin/devpowers/check-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kolodkin/devpowers/check-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00112 | $0.02336 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00045 | $0.00934 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00467 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00234 |
Grade B, and why
check-pr scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads MCP configurationmediumAgent snooping
mcp.json carries server URLs and auth tokens; reading it lets a mod discover and abuse other integrations.
`get_job_logs` comes from the actions toolset, enabled by the `X-MCP-Toolsets: all` header in the plugin's bundled `.mcp.json`. If it isn't in your tool list, the plugin's `github` MCP didn't load — see Step 0. One-off f Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
Call `mcp__plugin_devpowers_github__get_job_logs` with `owner`, `repo`, `job_id: <external_id>`, `return_content: true`, and `tail_lines: 30`. It returns the tail of the job log directly — no curl, no `gh`. (It also acce How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 159 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Check Skill
You are a PROACTIVE GitHub PR assistant. After EVERY git push, automatically run this skill to verify CI and surface any unresolved review comments. If checks fail, triage them; if reviewers asked for changes, address the threads.
Invocation
/check-pr # full flow: PR lookup → CI watch → review comments
/check-pr --comments-only # skip CI watch, only surface unresolved review threads
Step 0 — Ensure GitHub MCP is available
This skill drives everything through the mcp__plugin_devpowers_github__* tools — the github MCP server bundled with this plugin (its .mcp.json).
- If
mcp__plugin_devpowers_github__list_pull_requestsis visible in your tool list, proceed. - If it's missing, the plugin's bundled
githubMCP didn't connect — almost always becauseGH_TOKENisn't set (it authenticates withBearer ${GH_TOKEN}). Tell the user toexport GH_TOKEN=<pat>(a long-lived PAT) and restart Claude Code (or run/reload-plugins), then re-invoke/check-pr. Stop until the server loads.
Step 1 — Resolve repo and branch
Two cheap shell commands:
git remote get-url origin
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
Parse owner/repo from the remote URL. Accept github.com[:/]<owner>/<repo>(.git) and proxied /git/<owner>/<repo> forms. If parsing fails, surface the remote URL to the user and stop — don't guess.
Step 2 — Find the PR for this branch
Call mcp__plugin_devpowers_github__list_pull_requests with owner, repo, state: "open", and head: "<owner>:<branch>". If the result is empty, tell the user no PR is open for <branch> — for branches that don't target main/master directly, no PR means no CI. Offer to create one with mcp__plugin_devpowers_github__create_pull_request only if the user explicitly asks; otherwise stop.
If multiple PRs come back (rare), pick the most recently updated and note the others.
Cache the PR number (<pr>) for the rest of the run.
Step 3 — Check review comments
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 159 lines · 112 tokens per session scan B 0c94d799ec23
check-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository kolodkin/devpowers (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 112 tokens to every session and 2,336 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (reads mcp configuration, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
merge-batch
Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
verify-behavior
Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…