Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add konamgil/mandu --skill mandu-mcp-create-flowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/konamgil/manduWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/konamgil/mandu/mandu-mcp-create-flow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/konamgil/mandu/mandu-mcp-create-flow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/konamgil/mandu/mandu-mcp-create-flow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/konamgil/mandu/mandu-mcp-create-flow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/konamgil/mandu/mandu-mcp-create-flow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.01889 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00945 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00378 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
mandu-mcp-create-flow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 184 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Mandu MCP Create Flow
새 기능을 스캐폴딩할 때의 스펙 우선 레시피. "contract 없이 generate 먼저" 라는 대표적 실수를 방지하고, 가능한 한 집계 도구 (resource/feature/scaffold) 를 사용한다.
Trigger
- "만들어줘", "추가해줘", "create", "add"
- "CRUD" + 엔티티 이름
- 피처 / 라우트 / 리소스 / API 엔드포인트 / 컴포넌트 추가
mandu-create-feature또는mandu-create-apitask-shaped skill 이 활성화될 때
Decision Tree
요청의 단위를 먼저 구분한다.
요청 내용
├─ 리소스 단위 (User, Post, Comment 같은 도메인 엔티티)
│ → Track A: Resource flow
├─ 피처 단위 (페이지 + 섹션 + island + slot 세트)
│ → Track B: Feature flow
├─ 단일 라우트 (페이지 하나 또는 API 하나만)
│ → Track C: Route flow
└─ 스키마만 이미 있고 스캐폴드만 필요
→ Track D: Scaffold-only
Track A — Resource Flow (도메인 엔티티)
mandu.resource.create ← Tier-0 aggregate: resource + fields 묶음 생성
└─> mandu_create_contract ← Zod 계약 (집계 도구가 자동으로 요청하지 않을 때만)
└─> mandu_generate ← 스캐폴드 생성
└─> mandu-mcp-verify 로 전이
mandu.resource.create 인자 예:
mandu.resource.create({
name: "Post",
fields: { title: "string", content: "string", publishedAt: "datetime?" }
})
리소스가 생성되면 route / slot / contract 의 후보가 제안된다. 제안을 그대로
받아 mandu_generate 로 흘린다. 제안된 경로를 무시하고 mandu_add_route 로
손수 만들지 않는다.
Track B — Feature Flow (페이지 + island + slot)
mandu_analyze_structure ← alias of mandu.negotiate.analyze, 요구사항 → 구조 제안
└─> mandu.feature.create ← Tier-0 aggregate: 여러 라우트 + slot + island 묶음
└─> mandu_create_contract ← API 엔드포인트가 포함된 경우
└─> mandu_generate
└─> mandu-mcp-verify 로 전이
또는 단축 경로:
mandu_generate_scaffold ← alias of mandu.negotiate.scaffold,
negotiate + scaffold 를 한 번에
└─> mandu-mcp-verify
사용자가 이미 스키마를 구체적으로 제시했다면 mandu_analyze_structure 는 스킵.
"대충 사용자 프로필 페이지 만들어줘" 처럼 모호한 요청일 때만 negotiate 먼저.
Track C — Single Route Flow
mandu_add_route ← 파일 생성 (경로 규칙 자동 적용)
└─> mandu_create_contract ← API 라우트면 필수, 페이지만이면 생략 가능
└─> mandu_generate ← 스캐폴드 반영
└─> mandu-mcp-verify
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 184 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A a4e3fe1fde87
mandu-mcp-create-flow is a skill published in the GitHub repository konamgil/mandu (46 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MPL-2.0. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 1,889 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
api-design-patterns
Comprehensive API design patterns covering REST, GraphQL, gRPC, versioning, authentication, and modern API best practices.
architecture-patterns
Software architecture patterns and best practices.
Full Stack Engineer
Full Stack Engineer delivers production-grade technical work with clear architecture, tests, maintainability, and operational awareness.
pipeline
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a pipeline spec", "document data transformations", "document data flow", "specify pipeline invariants", "wyx pipeline", or wants to design, retrofit, or discover data pipelines with quality invariants and boundary ownership. Produces PIPELINE.md specs.
add-service
Add a service capsule (or Kafka topic node) to the Cosmos map. Use when the user says "add service X to the cosmos", "wire X into the map", or "add a topic node for Y". Researches the service from source, maps all its connections, then adds SERVICES/TOPICS entries to src/scenarios/ with correct position, color, and…
contract-test-engineer
Use when the user asks to verify compatibility between an API provider and consumer, SDK and service, event producer and consumer, schema versions, or serialized data. Define and test the shared contract, including failures and compatibility rules, before changing either side.