mandu-mcp-verify

mandu-mcp-verify is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from konamgil/mandu. It costs 66 tokens per session (2,068 once invoked), scanned A, original, MPL-2.0.

An automatic verification workflow for the Mandu project that runs after edits, generated files, or before a commit. It checks generated behavior, architecture rules, code quality, and project structure in parallel.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after editing files, asking whether a change is valid, generating code, or preparing a commit. Mandu is the project framework being checked.
Why use it?
It catches broken code, rule violations, and misplaced or missing imports soon after a change, before the problem travels further.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it after editing files, asking whether a change is valid, generating code, or preparing a commit. Mandu is the project framework being checked.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/konamgil/mandu/mandu-mcp-verify
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add konamgil/mandu --skill mandu-mcp-verify
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/konamgil/mandu

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for mandu-mcp-verify

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/konamgil/mandu/mandu-mcp-verify/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/konamgil/mandu/mandu-mcp-verify)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/konamgil/mandu/mandu-mcp-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/konamgil/mandu/mandu-mcp-verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for mandu-mcp-verify

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/konamgil/mandu/mandu-mcp-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/konamgil/mandu/mandu-mcp-verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 66 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,068 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00066 $0.02068
Opus 5 $0.00033 $0.01034
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.00414
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00207

Measured 10d ago against content hash 3a77a2ef1e77, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

mandu-mcp-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

docs/archive/skills/package-v0/mandu-mcp-verify/SKILL.md · 183 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 183 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Mandu MCP Verify

편집 직후 / 생성 직후 / pre-commit 에서 도는 표준 검증 루프. 핵심은 "하나의 ate 파이프라인 + guard + 구조 진단" 을 병렬 fast path 로 먼저 돌리고, 실패했을 때만 세분 도구로 drill-down 하는 것.

Trigger

  • 파일 편집 직후 (특히 app/, spec/, src/shared/contracts/)
  • mandu_generate 완료 직후 (create-flow 가 자동 전이)
  • "check 해줘", "제대로 된 거야?", "괜찮아?"
  • stop-hook / pre-commit 자동 실행
  • 사용자가 명시적으로 "verify", "validate", "검증"

Fast Path (병렬, 기본값)

네 도구는 서로 독립. 병렬 호출.

┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ mandu.ate.auto_pipeline     │  ← Tier-0: extract/generate/run/heal 전부
├─────────────────────────────┤
│ mandu_guard_check           │  ← Tier-1: 아키텍처 규칙 위반 스캔
├─────────────────────────────┤
│ mandu.lint                  │  ← 가드레일-lint: 코드 품질 스캔 (oxlint)
├─────────────────────────────┤
│ mandu_doctor                │  ← Tier-0: 구조/import/location 진단
└─────────────────────────────┘
       네 개를 parallel 호출

인자 예:

mandu.ate.auto_pipeline({
  repoRoot: ".",
  oracleLevel: "standard",
  useImpactAnalysis: true,    // 변경된 라우트만 대상
  autoHeal: false              // heal 은 별도 단계
})

mandu_guard_check({ repoRoot: "." })

mandu.lint({ typeAware: false })   // oxlint 미설치 시 조용히 skip

mandu_doctor({ repoRoot: "." })

네 응답을 수집하고 pass/fail 매트릭스를 만든다:

도구 pass fail 의 의미
ate.auto_pipeline 테스트 통과 + 계약 일치 테스트 실패 또는 impact 드리프트
guard_check 레이어/금지 import 위반 없음 아키텍처 규칙 위반
lint oxlint error 0 error 1+ (warning 은 informational)
doctor 파일 위치 / import 정상 구조 결함

네 개 모두 green → verify 종료. 사용자에게 압축 요약 제시.

Drill-Down (실패 시에만)

fast path 가 빨간 항목을 돌려주면 그 카테고리별로만 drill-down. 세 종류가 다 실패했다고 모든 drill-down 을 돌리지 말고, 응답에 들어온 카테고리만.

Guard 실패

mandu_guard_explain({ violationId })    ← 먼저: 왜 위반인지 설명
  → (자동 수정 가능하면) mandu_guard_heal({ autofix: true, violationIds: [...] })
  → (수동 수정이면) 사용자에게 수정 지시 후 fast path 재실행

ATE 실패 (테스트 실패 / 힐 후보 있음)

mandu.ate.feedback({ runId })           ← 힐 후보의 카테고리/우선순위
  → mandu.ate.apply_heal({ runId, healIndex, createBackup: true })
  → fast path 의 ate.auto_pipeline 재실행

Read the full file on GitHub · 183 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 183 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 3a77a2ef1e77

Subscribe to this mod's changes

mandu-mcp-verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository konamgil/mandu (46 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MPL-2.0. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 2,068 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

bug-fix

A structured bug-fixing workflow that takes a problem from reproduction and evidence-based cause finding through approval, implementation, testing, and cleanup.

rushengzhou/sid-code · 62 tokens

error-collection

A structured record of confirmed engineering mistakes, their root causes, and checks that prevent them from returning. It uses evidence from real application behavior, not just successful builds.

lfyxhappy/lfcode · 30 tokens

flaky-test-triage

Use when a test passes and fails intermittently, behaves differently by order, machine, runtime, timing, or retry, or when the user asks to reduce test flakiness. Gather repeatable evidence, isolate nondeterminism, and repair the causal dependency without weakening test intent.

lfyxhappy/lfcode · 63 tokens

test-debugger

Use when a test fails, flakes, hangs, or gives an unexpected result. Reproduce the failure with the narrowest package-local command, distinguish test defects from product defects and environment issues, and only implement a fix when the user authorizes changes.

lfyxhappy/lfcode · 54 tokens

bug-fixing

Fix defects in the Composio SDK repository with focused reproduction, root-cause analysis, regression tests, and narrow verification. Use when the user reports a bug, failing test, CI regression, runtime defect, or incorrect SDK behavior. Do not use for new feature design or broad refactors.

ComposioHQ/composio · 63 tokens

typescript-testing

Select and run TypeScript SDK verification for packages, examples, type checks, linting, builds, Vitest suites, and runtime E2E tests. Use when adding tests, diagnosing TypeScript CI, choosing a focused test command, or validating TypeScript package changes. Do not use for Python-only checks.

ComposioHQ/composio · 65 tokens