Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add konglong87/methodology-skills --skill ddd-strategic-designgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/konglong87/methodology-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/konglong87/methodology-skills/ddd-strategic-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/konglong87/methodology-skills/ddd-strategic-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/konglong87/methodology-skills/ddd-strategic-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/konglong87/methodology-skills/ddd-strategic-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/konglong87/methodology-skills/ddd-strategic-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00099 | $0.03230 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.01615 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00646 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00323 |
Grade A, and why
ddd-strategic-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 415 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Domain-Driven Design: Strategic Design
前置协议
环境检测
# 检测当前项目信息
PROJECT_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
COMMIT=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
echo "PROJECT: $PROJECT_ROOT"
echo "BRANCH: $BRANCH"
echo "COMMIT: $COMMIT"
前置技能检查
benefits-from 检查(推荐但非必须):
# 检查 goal-oriented 工件
GOAL_ARTIFACT="memory/artifacts/goal-oriented/latest.json"
if [ -f "$GOAL_ARTIFACT" ]; then
echo "FOUND: goal-oriented artifact"
# 提取目标信息,确保设计符合目标
fi
# 检查 first-principles 工件
FP_ARTIFACT="memory/artifacts/first-principles/latest.json"
if [ -f "$FP_ARTIFACT" ]; then
echo "FOUND: first-principles artifact"
# 提取第一性原理分析结果,用于指导设计
fi
工件目录初始化:
# 确保工件目录存在
mkdir -p memory/artifacts/ddd-strategic
用户意图确认
根据用户消息判断:
检查点:
- 是否需要设计新系统或重构现有系统
- 是否涉及多个业务领域或团队
- 是否需要识别系统边界和上下文关系
意图分类:
- 新系统设计:从零开始设计系统架构
- 系统重构:将单体拆分为微服务
- 架构优化:重新梳理上下文边界
- 业务建模:梳理业务领域
Overview
Strategic design focuses on defining bounded contexts and their relationships. A bounded context is a boundary within which a domain model is defined and applicable. Inside the boundary, all terms, rules, and logic have a specific, consistent meaning. Different contexts may use the same terms with different meanings.
Why it matters: Without clear boundaries, teams talk past each other. "Customer" means something different to Sales vs Support vs Billing. Strategic design makes these boundaries explicit.
Core principle: Language consistency within a boundary, explicit translation between boundaries.
Tactical design happens within each bounded context. See ddd-tactical-design skill for implementation details.
When to Use
Applicable:
- Starting a new project or system
- Decomposing a monolith into microservices
- Multiple teams working on the same domain
- Domain logic is complex and domain experts are available
- Language confusion across teams (same term, different meanings)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 415 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A cb5cc0bddbfb
ddd-strategic-design is a skill published in the GitHub repository konglong87/methodology-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 3,230 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
amby-design
Design the UI — wireframes, component specs, and design tokens — with a sign-off gate.
frontend-design
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI).…
web-design-guidelines
Review UI code for Web Interface Guidelines compliance. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", or "check my site against best practices".
omh-frontend
This is a Hermes-native frontend workflow skill.
omh-accessibility-audit
This is a Hermes-native accessibility-audit workflow skill.
omh-visual-qa
This is a Hermes-native visual-qa workflow skill.