pilot

pilot is a skill for Claude Code from konglong87/methodology-skills. It costs 47 tokens per session (3,552 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A router for choosing a suitable development method from a collection of methodology skills. It reads a request, identifies its type and technologies, and recommends an ordered sequence of methods.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when choosing a methodology, starting a complex project, or deciding whether to investigate, analyze causes, plan, test, or improve in a particular order.
Why use it?
It reduces the guesswork of deciding which process to use for a complex task. Recommendations can also account for known risks and lessons from earlier work.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool; built for gstack.

Good fit Use it when choosing a methodology, starting a complex project, or deciding whether to investigate, analyze causes, plan, test, or improve in a particular order.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/konglong87/methodology-skills/pilot
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add konglong87/methodology-skills --skill pilot
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/konglong87/methodology-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for pilot

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/konglong87/methodology-skills/pilot/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/konglong87/methodology-skills/pilot)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/konglong87/methodology-skills/pilot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/konglong87/methodology-skills/pilot/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for pilot

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/konglong87/methodology-skills/pilot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/konglong87/methodology-skills/pilot.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 47 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,552 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00047 $0.03552
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.01776
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00710
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00355

Measured 8d ago against content hash a6eede752247, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pilot scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/pilot/SKILL.md · 550 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 550 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Pilot - 技能领航员

前置协议

环境检测

PROJECT_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
COMMIT=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")

echo "PROJECT: $PROJECT_ROOT"
echo "BRANCH: $BRANCH"
echo "COMMIT: $COMMIT"

工件目录初始化

mkdir -p memory/artifacts/pilot

经验读取(推荐)

触发时机:分析任务类型前,为当前任务准备最佳实践

推荐动作:调用 experience-manager 技能检索相关经验

执行步骤

  1. 提取任务关键词

    从用户请求中提取:
    - 核心任务关键词
    - 技术栈关键词
    - 问题类型关键词
    
  2. 写入请求工件

    Write(
      file_path="memory/artifacts/pilot/experience-request.json",
      content={
        "requesting_skill": "pilot",
        "action": "retrieve",
        "task_keywords": ["关键词1", "关键词2"],
        "task_type": "bugfix|feature|refactor",
        "technologies": ["Technology1", "Technology2"]
      }
    )
    
  3. 读取经验结果

    result = Read("memory/artifacts/experience-manager/experience-result.json")
    
  4. 应用到技能推荐

    基于历史经验,推荐以下技能链:
    
    1. /investigate - 快速定位问题(历史成功率 90%)
    2. /first-principles - 分析根本原因(历史应用 5 次)
    3. /pdca-cycle - 迭代优化
    
    ⚠️ 预防措施(来自历史经验):
    - 新项目优先检查国际化配置
    - 使用标准配置模板
    

价值:基于历史经验优化技能推荐,提高成功率。

错误预防(自动)

触发时机:检测到潜在错误风险时

自动动作:调用 experience-manager 获取预防建议

执行步骤

  1. 检测风险

    在分析任务类型时,检测常见的错误风险:
    - 缺少配置检查
    - 使用了已废弃的API
    - 忽略了边界情况
    
  2. 写入预防请求

    Write(
      file_path="memory/artifacts/pilot/error-prevention-request.json",
      content={
        "requesting_skill": "pilot",
        "action": "prevent",
        "current_step": "任务分析",
        "context": {
          "technology": "...",
          "feature": "...",
          "risk_factors": [...]
        }
      }
    )
    
  3. 展示预防建议

    ## 💡 错误预防提醒
    
    检测到潜在风险:国际化配置缺失
    
    **预防措施**:
    - 优先检查 next.config.js 中的 i18n 配置
    - 使用标准配置模板
    
    **历史错误**:2026-03-20 类似错误
    

价值:提前预防错误,避免重复踩坑。

Overview

智能分析用户请求,推荐最佳的方法论技能组合,实现技能协同工作。

Read the full file on GitHub · 550 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 550 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A a6eede752247

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pilot is a skill published in the GitHub repository konglong87/methodology-skills (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 3,552 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

importing-a-codebase

Use when the repo holds real source code but no specs: the existing-codebase branch of setting-up-a-project, normally reached via that dispatcher, directly only when the situation is unmistakable. Not for empty workspaces (starting-a-new-project) or feature work in a specced project (brainstorming).

JetBrains/thinkrail · 69 tokens

starting-a-new-project

Use when the workspace is empty — no code yet — and the user brings a raw idea: the brand-new branch of setting-up-a-project, normally reached via that dispatcher, directly only when the situation is unmistakable. Not for features in an existing project — use brainstorming instead.

JetBrains/thinkrail · 61 tokens

todos

This chat has a shared, live TODO plan — your tasks for the conversation, which the user also edits. Read this skill and reach for the todo tools whenever a request takes more than a couple of steps. It covers the plan model (group = task, items = its steps; loose items are the user's lane), how to work it: propose…

JetBrains/thinkrail · 127 tokens

writing-workflow-skills

Use when adding a new workflow skill to pi-thinkrail-workflow, changing an existing workflow skill's role, trigger, handoff, or structure, or checking a workflow skill against the workflow system's rules. Not for authoring general-purpose skills outside this package.

JetBrains/thinkrail · 60 tokens

brainstorming

Use this BEFORE any creative or feature work: building a new feature, adding functionality, changing behavior, or making a nontrivial design decision. Turns the user's request into a validated design — recorded as a spec-graph task-spec — before any implementation. Do not skip this because a change looks small.

JetBrains/thinkrail · 65 tokens

reviewing-changes

Use when a review package asks you to review a plan step's change set (todo.startReview): you are the REVIEWER, not the author. How to judge an agent-written diff, file findings with addreviewcomment, and settle with exactly one reviewverdict.

JetBrains/thinkrail · 59 tokens