Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add KornLabs/truss --skill code-e2e-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KornLabs/trussWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kornlabs/truss/code-e2e-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kornlabs/truss/code-e2e-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kornlabs/truss/code-e2e-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kornlabs/truss/code-e2e-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kornlabs/truss/code-e2e-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.02190 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00876 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00438 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00219 |
Grade A, and why
code-e2e-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 329 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 5d4992c6c087
code-e2e-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository KornLabs/truss (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 2,190 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-23.
Other skills, from other repositories
game-playtesting
Test a game end to end like a player across boot, controls, gameplay loops, UI, save state, failure recovery, rendering, audio, performance, and platform behavior. Use after game implementation or for regression investigation.
browser-qa
Validate web applications through the embedded browser with responsive, interaction, console, and screenshot checks.
pod-e2e
ONLY for developing Kiro Crew itself -- if the project you are working on is anything else, ignore this skill: it drives Kiro Crew's own pod tooling, which does not exist in another repository. Boots a Kiro Crew feature worktree's full stack as an ISOLATED throwaway pod and proves it boots, authenticates and renders…
relay-80-100-workflow
Use when writing agent-relay workflows that must fully validate features end-to-end before merging. Covers the 80-to-100 pattern - going beyond "code compiles" to "feature works, tested E2E locally." Includes repair-before-failure validation gates, review-depth fresh-eyes review/fix loops with test hardening, PGlite…
browser-testing-with-screenshots
Use when testing web applications with visual verification - automates Chrome browser interactions, element selection, and screenshot capture for confirming UI functionality.
01-acceptance-qa
Validate a reviewed candidate's observable behavior against its acceptance criteria and record short named videos as reviewer evidence. Use when acceptance criteria exist and a browser-observable journey needs proof it holds. Do NOT use for diff review, unit or integration tests, or application fixes.