Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kouroshez/coding-os --skill wordpressgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kouroshez/coding-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kouroshez/coding-os/wordpress)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kouroshez/coding-os/wordpress"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kouroshez/coding-os/wordpress/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kouroshez/coding-os/wordpress"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kouroshez/coding-os/wordpress.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00159 | $0.01328 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00079 | $0.00664 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00266 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
wordpress scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WordPress
WordPress has its own way of doing everything, and fighting it produces brittle, insecure code. Three WP-specific disciplines carry most of the safety: nonces (intent), capability checks (authorization), and sanitize-in / escape-out (data). The PHP language craft is owned by php; this is the WordPress layer on top.
Scan a plugin/theme for the WordPress security footguns:
python3 scripts/scan_wp_smells.py wp-content/plugins/myplugin/**/*.php
Hooks — the entire extension model
// actions DO something; filters TRANSFORM and must return
add_action('init', 'myplugin_register');
add_filter('the_content', function (string $content): string {
return $content . '<p>Appended.</p>'; // a filter MUST return the value
});
You extend WordPress by hooking, never by editing core. An add_filter callback
that forgets to return silently blanks the content. Register everything on the
right hook (init, wp_enqueue_scripts, rest_api_init) — running too early
means core isn't loaded yet. Detail → references/wp-development.md.
The security trinity (every request handler)
function myplugin_save(): void {
// 1. NONCE — the request came from your form, not a forged one
if (!isset($_POST['_wpnonce']) || !wp_verify_nonce($_POST['_wpnonce'], 'myplugin_save')) {
wp_die('Bad nonce');
}
// 2. CAPABILITY — this user is allowed to do this
if (!current_user_can('edit_posts')) {
wp_die('Forbidden');
}
// 3. SANITIZE input, ESCAPE output
$title = sanitize_text_field($_POST['title'] ?? '');
update_post_meta($post_id, 'title', $title);
}
All three, every time. A nonce without a capability check stops forgery but not an under-privileged user; a capability check without a nonce is CSRF-able; neither without sanitizing is injection. Detail → references/wp-security.md.
Database — $wpdb->prepare, always
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 111 lines · 159 tokens per session scan A db4a5a6d1c40
wordpress is a skill published in the GitHub repository kouroshez/coding-os (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 159 tokens to every session and 1,328 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
potpie-repo-baseline
Use when establishing, refreshing, or deeply understanding a repository's baseline memory in Potpie: purpose, application type, features, services/modules, environments, deploy shape, dependencies, API contracts, datastores, integrations, ownership, and explicit preferences. The harness reads authored and…
potpie-infra-architecture
Use for project infra and architecture context: environments, adapters, runtime configuration, deployments, service dependencies, datastores, API contracts, ownership, incidents, and dependency blast radius.
potpie-project-preferences
Use before writing, modifying, reviewing, refactoring, or testing code so repo/project preferences surface: error handling, file structure, frameworks, logging, dependency choices, testing, security, API style, and naming. Also use after code work when a reusable project preference should be recorded.
booboo-deploy
Stand up a Booboo brain end to end — scaffold the project, write booboo.config.yaml against a real Postgres/Supabase or JSON source, build the snapshot, then wire the REST API, the MCP server, the 3D viewer and the panel. Use when someone wants a brain built for the first time, wants to point Booboo at their own…
booboo-adapter
Feed data into a Booboo brain that the built-in postgres and json adapters do not cover — write a small config-driven adapter against the spec instead of forking the builder. Use when a source is Neo4j, an API, a CSV export, a proprietary store, or any shape the standard config cannot express.
python-sdk
Implement or modify Python SDK behavior under python/composio, including tools, toolkits, sessions, auth configs, connected accounts, client integration, and shared Python models. Use for Python core runtime/API work; pair with python-testing and cross-sdk-parity when TypeScript must match.