accessibility-testing

A guide for checking whether web pages and components work for people with disabilities, using automated and manual checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to run accessibility checks with tools such as pa11y and axe-core, add them to continuous integration, and assess WCAG 2.2 criteria.
Why use it?
It helps find accessibility problems that automated tests alone may miss and makes the results trackable.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/kreerc/accessibility.md/accessibility-testing
Any agent
npx skills add KreerC/ACCESSIBILITY.md --skill accessibility-testing
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KreerC/ACCESSIBILITY.md

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 13 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 610 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00013 $0.00610
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.00305
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00122
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00061

Measured 2d ago against content hash d9d30597696d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

accessibility-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

accessibility-testing/SKILL.md · 48 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Implementing accessibility correctly is crucial to deliver quality web experiences for everyone, including developers.

Software requirements & programmatic testing

To catch accessibility defects quickly and reliably, employ automated and rule-based accessibility checks. For this, set up a development requirement for the pa11y/pa11y CLI tool and the axe-core runner, and run it against fresh development builds. Also cover individual features and components, isolated from the rest of the page.

Include these checker tools into an existing CI pipeline.

Manual checks

For each component, check each component for its full WCAG 2.2 level AAA conformance, and create a table that contains the number of the success criterion, its name, a short description, and the conformance status (pass, fail, not applicable, untested)

If it helps, you may also make this as a template and re-use it accordingly.

You may use browser based tools (like Playwright) to run checks yourself that traditionally required real users for testing. If you can't make a judgement or it might be un-reliable, note a todo with a clear and concise assessment instruction for a developer.

Generate deliverables

Whenever you have made an accessibility assessment or judgement, produce a short writeup of all documented issues and suggested fixes. Never suggest quick-wins or shorthand fixes if a complete architectural overhaul would be the better and correct choice. This is especially true if the quick fix would involve ARIA patterns.

Accessibility information (European Accessibility Act requirement)

As required per EU law and local equivalents (e.g. Barrierefreiheitsstärkungsgesetz/BFSG in Germany), projects are required to have a public-facing information page about the accessibility of the page, with the following contents in natural language:

  • the name of the service
  • a general description of the service
  • email address and phone number of the provider, and a physical address if available
  • names of the applicable laws
  • a mention of used tools and processes to ensure accessibility, as well as the names of any agent that is used for the assessment
  • accessibility details for each criterion in simple language (pass, fail, not applicable)
  • contact details of the governing body (in Germany for example, Marktüberwachungsstelle der Länder für die Barrierefreiheit von Produkten und Dienstleistungen, MLBF AöR, Magdeburg)
  • the date of the last assessment
  • a date at which all failed requirements are fixed

Read the full file on GitHub · 48 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 48 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A d9d30597696d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

accessibility-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository KreerC/ACCESSIBILITY.md (32 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 610 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

web-accessibility-audit

Audit web applications for WCAG accessibility compliance. Use when asked to run accessibility checks, identify common violations, and provide remediation guidance.

warpdotdev/oz-skills · 32 tokens

iOS SwiftUI Accessibility

Enforces WCAG 2.2 accessible coding patterns when writing SwiftUI — labels, traits, Dynamic Type, contrast, touch targets, focus management, orientation, and more. Based on the ios-swiftui-accessibility-techniques project with 41 static analysis rules across 23 WCAG criteria.

cvs-health/ios-swiftui-accessibility-techniques · 67 tokens

Accessibility Auditor

Comprehensive WCAG 2.1 AA compliance testing combining automated axe-core scans with manual keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and focus management verification.

PramodDutta/qaskills · 32 tokens

Document Accessibility Wizard

Interactive document accessibility audit wizard. Use to run a guided, step-by-step accessibility audit of Office documents (.docx, .xlsx, .pptx) and PDFs. Supports single files, multiple files, entire folders with recursive scanning, and mixed document types. Orchestrates specialist sub-agents (word-accessibility…

Community-Access/accessibility-agents · 87 tokens

Issue Tracker

Your GitHub issue command center -- find, triage, review, and respond to issues with full markdown + HTML reports saved to your workspace. Includes reactions, release context, and discussion awareness.

Community-Access/accessibility-agents · 42 tokens

Accessibility A11y Enhanced

Comprehensive WCAG compliance and accessibility testing covering ARIA, keyboard navigation, screen readers, color contrast, and automated a11y validation.

PramodDutta/qaskills · 34 tokens