Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add krishagel/geoffrey --skill legislative-trackergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/krishagel/geoffreyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/krishagel/geoffrey/legislative-tracker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/krishagel/geoffrey/legislative-tracker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/krishagel/geoffrey/legislative-tracker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/krishagel/geoffrey/legislative-tracker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/krishagel/geoffrey/legislative-tracker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.02495 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00998 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00499 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00249 |
Grade A, and why
legislative-tracker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- legislative-tracker — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 357 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Legislative Tracker Skill
Track Washington State K-12 education legislation from leg.wa.gov using committee-based discovery. This approach queries committees directly via SOAP API to get ALL bills - not just keyword matches.
Why Committee-Based Discovery
Problem with keyword searching: Bills with unexpected wording or indirect impacts get missed. A bill about "unfunded mandates" might never mention "school" but still affect districts.
Solution: Query education committees directly. If a bill is in the House Education Committee or Senate Early Learning & K-12 Education Committee, it's education-related by definition.
Discovery Strategy
Tier 1: Direct Education Bills (Comprehensive)
Query these committees to get ALL education bills:
| Committee | Chamber | Query |
|---|---|---|
| Education | House | All bills - no filtering |
| Early Learning & K-12 Education | Senate | All bills - no filtering |
Tier 2: Indirect Impact Bills (Candidates)
Query these committees and filter via WebFetch:
| Committee | Chamber |
|---|---|
| Appropriations | House |
| Capital Budget | House |
| Labor & Workplace Standards | House |
| Ways & Means | Senate |
| Labor & Commerce | Senate |
| State Government, Tribal Affairs & Elections | Senate |
Workflow: The SOAP API returns only bill IDs. Geoffrey must:
- Get all bill IDs from Tier 2 committees (~700 bills)
- WebFetch each bill's summary page to get the title/description
- Filter for education keywords in the description
- Add matching bills to the tracked list
Filter keywords: school, student, teacher, education, k-12, district, ospi, classroom, principal, paraeducator, learning, instruction, curriculum, diploma, graduation, superintendent, levy, bond, capital, school construction
Tier 3: WebSearch Fallback
If SOAP API fails, use WebSearch:
site:leg.wa.gov "referred to Education" 2025-26
site:leg.wa.gov "Early Learning & K-12" 2025-26
site:leg.wa.gov K-12 school district bill 2025
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 357 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 1456634f0cc3
legislative-tracker is a skill published in the GitHub repository krishagel/geoffrey (7 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 2,495 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
fto-triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent…
legal-hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legalhold fields in log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report.
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
terms-of-service
Draft terms of service and a companion privacy notice matched to the product's form and feature modules, not legal advice, delivered as a Word document.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
ai-risk-management
Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the…