Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Kshitijpalsinghtomar/depth-skills --skill ds-emergencegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kshitijpalsinghtomar/depth-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kshitijpalsinghtomar/depth-skills/ds-emergence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kshitijpalsinghtomar/depth-skills/ds-emergence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kshitijpalsinghtomar/depth-skills/ds-emergence/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kshitijpalsinghtomar/depth-skills/ds-emergence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kshitijpalsinghtomar/depth-skills/ds-emergence.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.01603 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00801 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00321 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00160 |
Grade A, and why
emergence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
EMERGENCE — Interaction-Level Analyzer
You've analyzed each component. Each one is correct in isolation. Each passes its tests.
Now: what happens when they interact?
Emergence is what systems do that no individual part was designed to do. It is the traffic jam no car intended. The cascading failure no single service caused. The security vulnerability living in the gap between two correct components.
Component-level analysis cannot see this. These behaviors exist only in the interaction.
The Failure Mode You Must Recognize
You just reviewed each component separately and declared them all correct. You are about to say "the system should work" without checking:
- Whether component A and component B both write to the same resource (contention)
- Whether component A's error handling triggers component B's error handling (feedback loop)
- Whether component A assumes it's the only consumer of a resource that component C also uses (assumption collision)
- Whether the behavior changes when component A responds in 5000ms instead of 50ms (timing dependency)
Individual correctness does not guarantee system correctness.
The Protocol
Step 1 — MAP ALL INTERACTIONS
List every component in THIS system. Then map every interaction — both designed and hidden:
INTERACTION MAP
────────────────────────────────────────
COMPONENTS:
1. [name — what it does]
2. [name — what it does]
3. [name — what it does]
...
DESIGNED INTERACTIONS (explicit — the intended interfaces):
[A] → [B]: [what data/signal flows and how]
[B] → [C]: [what data/signal flows and how]
HIDDEN INTERACTIONS (implicit — not designed but real):
[A] and [C]: both write to [shared resource]
[B] and [D]: both consume from [shared queue/pool/API]
[A] and [D]: compete for [shared capacity — network/memory/CPU]
[B] and [E]: both process [same request/data] with different assumptions
────────────────────────────────────────
The hidden interactions are where emergence lives. Designed interactions are tested. Hidden interactions are not.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 189 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 63b6d6c63d79
emergence is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kshitijpalsinghtomar/depth-skills (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,603 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
refactoring-patterns
Code refactoring patterns with before/after diffs for extract method, extract class, inline, move, rename, dead code removal, dependency injection, and code smell detection.
pr-review
AUTHOR SKILL (internal to microsoft/aspire-skills). Reviews pull requests into this repo for problems only — bugs, regressions, missing eval coverage, frontmatter or routing damage, plugin-manifest drift, hook safety, and other concrete issues. Drives a six-step workflow: identify the PR, ensure the branch is…
predict
Analyzes diffs for regression risk and blast radius, generates risk-scored impact report. Triggers: PR review, code change risk, breaking change, blast radius, regression check.
squid-architecture-review
Periodic architectural sweep — reads existing ADRs, maps modules/dependencies/layering, and reports up to 10 prioritised findings shaped as refactor proposals /squid-refactor can consume directly.
analyze
Analyzes code quality, complexity, patterns across codebase. Triggers: quality report, hotspot scan, code analysis, architecture signal.
codex
Multi-AI adversarial fallback chain — three tiers: Codex CLI (primary), OpenCode/GLM5 (fallback), Claude subagent (last resort). Three modes: review (code review with pass/fail gate), challenge (adversarial — tries to break your code), consult (ask anything with session continuity). Use when asked to "codex review"…