Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kucherenko/gangsta --skill the-consiglieregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kucherenko/gangstaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kucherenko/gangsta/the-consigliere)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kucherenko/gangsta/the-consigliere"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kucherenko/gangsta/the-consigliere/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kucherenko/gangsta/the-consigliere"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kucherenko/gangsta/the-consigliere.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00660 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00330 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
the-consigliere scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
The Consigliere: Architectural Advisor and Ethical Auditor
Overview
The Consigliere provides the Don with impartial, logic-based advice. It operates outside the direct chain of command — neither the Underboss nor Crew Leads can override or skip the Consigliere's assessments.
The Consigliere does NOT write code. It does NOT execute tasks. It thinks, reviews, and advises.
When the Don Should Consult the Consigliere
- Before signing a Contract (The Sit-Down) — spec integrity review
- When a Worker escalation reaches the Don — independent assessment
- When security or architectural concerns arise — audit authority
- During Laundering — final architectural review of integrated code
- Whenever the Don wants a second opinion — impartial advisory
- When systematic debugging is needed — route to
gangsta:interrogation-debuggingfirst, consult Consigliere if architectural concerns emerge
The Consigliere's Process
Spec Integrity Review
When reviewing a Contract or spec:
- Contradiction Scan: Do any sections contradict each other?
- Ambiguity Check: Could any requirement be interpreted two different ways?
- Completeness Audit: Are there missing error handling paths, edge cases, or security considerations?
- Constitution Alignment: Does the spec respect all Commandments and Negative Constraints?
- Verdict: APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONCERNS (list them), or REJECT (with reasons)
Security Audit
When reviewing code or architecture:
- Secret Exposure: Are any credentials, keys, or tokens at risk?
- Input Validation: Are all user inputs sanitized and validated?
- Authorization: Are access controls properly scoped?
- Dependency Risk: Are there known vulnerabilities in dependencies?
- Verdict: SECURE, CONCERNS (list them with severity), or BLOCK (critical issue)
Truth Check (Omerta Law 3)
The Consigliere can invoke a Truth Check at any point:
- Identify the specific claim being checked
- Request the source citation
- Verify the citation matches the claim
- If uncited or incorrect: flag as invalid — the agent must retract or provide valid citation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 73 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 06844c0fd621
the-consigliere is a skill published in the GitHub repository kucherenko/gangsta (81 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 660 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
cocoreview
CocoReview — structured code review with six-severity findings vocabulary, progressive disclosure architecture, and universal anti-pattern baseline. Invoked via $review [file] [--complexity] [--security] [--architecture] [--language ].
sentinel
CocoSentinel — eight-dimension artifact quality gate. Dimension G evidence pre-gate runs first (deterministic, .
review
Enter the Review phase of CocoBrew. Aggregates findings from Code Quality Advisor, CocoCupper intelligence, spec compliance check, and decision coverage gate. Produces review.md with decision points. Requires developer approval before $ship can proceed.
lean-review
CocoLean diff-scoped over-engineering audit — scans uncommitted git diff and applies five classification tags (delete/stdlib/native/yagni/shrink) to identify unnecessary surface area before commit.
sentinel-approve
CocoSentinel approval — records SHA-bound approval for a previously evaluated artifact. Invoked via $sentinel --approve [file]. Voids automatically if the artifact is modified after approval.
sentinel-report
CocoSentinel report — displays evaluation history and approval status for artifacts in the project. Invoked via $sentinel --report.