Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding --skill dedup-code-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboardingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/dedup-code-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/dedup-code-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/dedup-code-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/dedup-code-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding/dedup-code-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00355 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00178 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
dedup-code-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Iron Law: Never delete code labeled as duplicate without verifying all call sites are updated; always confirm zero remaining references before removing.
Code Deduplication Skill
Purpose
Provides systematic methodology for detecting code duplication, unused code, and dependency bloat -- primarily in Flutter + Firebase codebases but applicable to any project.
Process
- Discover -- Map project structure, features, shared utilities, and test coverage
- Scan -- Run multi-phase analysis for duplicates, dead code, and unused dependencies
- Classify -- Categorize findings by severity (Critical / Warning / Suggestion)
- Report -- Output structured report with file locations, counts, and recommendations
For the complete analysis methodology, detection patterns, and report format:
Read reference/dedup-analysis-methodology.md
Error Handling
If the target directory does not exist, report "Target not found" with the path searched. If no duplication is found, report "No duplicates detected" with the scan scope and file count.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 40 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 0a95f7a169ea
dedup-code-agent is a skill published in the GitHub repository kumaran-is/claude-code-onboarding (35 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 355 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.
gsd-ns-review
Route to the appropriate quality / review skill based on the user's intent. gsd-code-review-fix was absorbed by gsd-code-review --fix in #2790.
issue
Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the…
gitnexus
A code-graph analysis add-on for examining an existing codebase, including symbols, call paths, execution flows, and effects across repositories. It can query GitNexus through its command-line or MCP interfaces.
cleanup-code-inspections
Reduce technical debt and improve code quality by systematically resolving static analysis warnings.
dorodango
Polishes working code through successive quality passes in fresh subagents. Use after tests pass when code needs multi-dimension refinement before release.