Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add KunanonJ/ai-skills-hub --skill rust-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KunanonJ/ai-skills-hubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kunanonj/ai-skills-hub/rust-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kunanonj/ai-skills-hub/rust-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kunanonj/ai-skills-hub/rust-testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.03069 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01535 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00614 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00307 |
Grade A, and why
rust-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to rust-testing — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 501 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Rust Testing Patterns
Comprehensive Rust testing patterns for writing reliable, maintainable tests following TDD methodology.
When to Use
- Writing new Rust functions, methods, or traits
- Adding test coverage to existing code
- Creating benchmarks for performance-critical code
- Implementing property-based tests for input validation
- Following TDD workflow in Rust projects
How It Works
- Identify target code — Find the function, trait, or module to test
- Write a test — Use
#[test]in a#[cfg(test)]module, rstest for parameterized tests, or proptest for property-based tests - Mock dependencies — Use mockall to isolate the unit under test
- Run tests (RED) — Verify the test fails with the expected error
- Implement (GREEN) — Write minimal code to pass
- Refactor — Improve while keeping tests green
- Check coverage — Use cargo-llvm-cov, target 80%+
TDD Workflow for Rust
The RED-GREEN-REFACTOR Cycle
RED → Write a failing test first
GREEN → Write minimal code to pass the test
REFACTOR → Improve code while keeping tests green
REPEAT → Continue with next requirement
Step-by-Step TDD in Rust
// RED: Write test first, use todo!() as placeholder
pub fn add(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 { todo!() }
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_add() { assert_eq!(add(2, 3), 5); }
}
// cargo test → panics at 'not yet implemented'
// GREEN: Replace todo!() with minimal implementation
pub fn add(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 { a + b }
// cargo test → PASS, then REFACTOR while keeping tests green
Unit Tests
Module-Level Test Organization
// src/user.rs
pub struct User {
pub name: String,
pub email: String,
}
impl User {
pub fn new(name: impl Into<String>, email: impl Into<String>) -> Result<Self, String> {
let email = email.into();
if !email.contains('@') {
return Err(format!("invalid email: {email}"));
}
Ok(Self { name: name.into(), email })
}
pub fn display_name(&self) -> &str {
&self.name
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn creates_user_with_valid_email() {
let user = User::new("Alice", "[email protected]").unwrap();
assert_eq!(user.display_name(), "Alice");
assert_eq!(user.email, "[email protected]");
}
#[test]
fn rejects_invalid_email() {
let result = User::new("Bob", "not-an-email");
assert!(result.is_err());
assert!(result.unwrap_err().contains("invalid email"));
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 501 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A e55dc89ab64a
rust-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository KunanonJ/ai-skills-hub (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 3,069 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to rust-testing, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
django-tdd
Django testing strategies with pytest-django, TDD methodology, factoryboy, mocking, coverage, and testing Django REST Framework APIs.
golang-testing
A guide to testing Go programs, including test-driven development (TDD), table-driven tests, coverage, and debugging. TDD means writing a failing test before implementing the code that makes it pass.
python-testing
A Python testing guide covering pytest, test coverage, and test-driven development (TDD), a method of writing a failing test before the code that makes it pass.
cpp-testing
A guide for testing C++17/20 code with GoogleTest, GoogleMock, CMake, and CTest. It covers unit and integration tests, test discovery, coverage, and sanitizers.
perl-testing
Perl testing patterns using Test2::V0, Test::More, prove runner, mocking, coverage with Devel::Cover, and TDD methodology.
springboot-tdd
Test-driven development for Spring Boot using JUnit 5, Mockito, MockMvc, Testcontainers, and JaCoCo. Use when adding features, fixing bugs, or refactoring.