Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add KunanonJ/ai-skills-hub --skill testing-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KunanonJ/ai-skills-hubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kunanonj/ai-skills-hub/testing-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kunanonj/ai-skills-hub/testing-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kunanonj/ai-skills-hub/testing-patterns.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01509 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00754 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00302 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00151 |
Grade A, and why
testing-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 271 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Patterns and Utilities
Testing Philosophy
Test-Driven Development (TDD):
- Write failing test FIRST
- Implement minimal code to pass
- Refactor after green
- Never write production code without a failing test
Behavior-Driven Testing:
- Test behavior, not implementation
- Focus on public APIs and business requirements
- Avoid testing implementation details
- Use descriptive test names that describe behavior
Factory Pattern:
- Create
getMockX(overrides?: Partial<X>)functions - Provide sensible defaults
- Allow overriding specific properties
- Keep tests DRY and maintainable
Test Utilities
Custom Render Function
Create a custom render that wraps components with required providers:
// src/utils/testUtils.tsx
import { render } from '@testing-library/react-native';
import { ThemeProvider } from './theme';
export const renderWithTheme = (ui: React.ReactElement) => {
return render(
<ThemeProvider>{ui}</ThemeProvider>
);
};
Usage:
import { renderWithTheme } from 'utils/testUtils';
import { screen } from '@testing-library/react-native';
it('should render component', () => {
renderWithTheme(<MyComponent />);
expect(screen.getByText('Hello')).toBeTruthy();
});
Factory Pattern
Component Props Factory
import { ComponentProps } from 'react';
const getMockMyComponentProps = (
overrides?: Partial<ComponentProps<typeof MyComponent>>
) => {
return {
title: 'Default Title',
count: 0,
onPress: jest.fn(),
isLoading: false,
...overrides,
};
};
// Usage in tests
it('should render with custom title', () => {
const props = getMockMyComponentProps({ title: 'Custom Title' });
renderWithTheme(<MyComponent {...props} />);
expect(screen.getByText('Custom Title')).toBeTruthy();
});
Data Factory
interface User {
id: string;
name: string;
email: string;
role: 'admin' | 'user';
}
const getMockUser = (overrides?: Partial<User>): User => {
return {
id: '123',
name: 'John Doe',
email: '[email protected]',
role: 'user',
...overrides,
};
};
// Usage
it('should display admin badge for admin users', () => {
const user = getMockUser({ role: 'admin' });
renderWithTheme(<UserCard user={user} />);
expect(screen.getByText('Admin')).toBeTruthy();
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 271 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 0413a6d6a756
testing-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository KunanonJ/ai-skills-hub (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,509 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
cpp-testing
A guide for testing C++17/20 code with GoogleTest, GoogleMock, CMake, and CTest. It covers unit and integration tests, test discovery, coverage, and sanitizers.
perl-testing
Perl testing patterns using Test2::V0, Test::More, prove runner, mocking, coverage with Devel::Cover, and TDD methodology.
rust-testing
Rust testing patterns including unit tests, integration tests, async testing, property-based testing, mocking, and coverage. Follows TDD methodology.
writing-tests
Write unit tests, component tests, and integration tests for AiderDesk using Vitest and React Testing Library. Use when creating new tests, adding test coverage, configuring mocks, setting up test files, or debugging failing tests.
run-affected-test-file-in-isolation-and-in-co-run-with-its-test-
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
use-internals-di-seam-pattern-for-test-injectable-functions
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.