Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/kv0906/pm-kit/meetnpx skills add kv0906/pm-kit --skill meetgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kv0906/pm-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kv0906/pm-kit/meet)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kv0906/pm-kit/meet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kv0906/pm-kit/meet.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00640 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00320 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
meet scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/meet — Meeting Processing
Process raw meeting notes into structured notes with extracted decisions, blockers, and action items.
Context
Today's date: !date +%Y-%m-%d
Recent meetings: !ls meetings/*.md 2>/dev/null | tail -5
Reference template: @_templates/meeting.md Config: @_core/config.yaml Processing logic: @_core/PROCESSING.md
Input
User input: $ARGUMENTS
Then user will paste raw notes.
Session Task Progress
TaskCreate: "Parse meeting metadata"
activeForm: "Parsing meeting metadata..."
TaskCreate: "Extract decisions, blockers, actions"
activeForm: "Extracting items from notes..."
TaskCreate: "Create linked notes"
activeForm: "Creating linked notes..."
Processing Steps
-
Parse Input
- Extract project
- Extract type: sync, milestone, external
- Generate slug from title
-
Request Notes
- If notes not provided, prompt: "Paste your meeting notes:"
-
Extract from Notes
- Decisions: Look for "decided", "agreed", "going with"
- Blockers: Look for "blocked", "stuck", "waiting on"
- Action Items: Look for "will do", "action:", "TODO", "@name"
- Attendees: Look for @mentions or name lists
-
Create Meeting Note
- Filename:
meetings/{date}-{type}-{slug}.md - Apply template with extracted data
- Add
## Linkssection
- Filename:
-
Create Linked Notes
- For each decision: Create
decisions/{project}/{date}-{slug}.md - For each blocker: Create
blockers/{project}/{date}-{slug}.md - Link back to meeting note
- For each decision: Create
-
Update References
- Add to project index if exists
-
Append to Vault Log
- Append entry to
01-index/_vault-log.md(see.claude/rules/vault-log.md) - Action:
meeting - Details: summarize what was extracted (decisions, blockers, action items)
- Append entry to
Output
Created: meetings/{date}-{type}-{slug}.md
Extracted:
- Decisions: {count} (notes created)
- Blockers: {count} (notes created)
- Action items: {count}
Export (Optional)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 87 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 88e491e71eb0
meet is a skill published in the GitHub repository kv0906/pm-kit (133 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 640 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
critique-agent
Pressure-test an existing product brief or PRD pack — find gaps, hidden assumptions, inconsistencies, and failure modes before stakeholder review. Use when: critique brief, critique PRD, devils advocate, red team, pressure test, find holes, what could go wrong, stress test the doc, pre-mortem.
interview-frameworks
Frameworks for user interviews, question design, and qualitative research. Use when conducting user interviews, designing interview guides, researching user needs, or gathering qualitative insights. Trigger on: 'create an interview guide', 'how do I interview users', 'customer discovery questions', 'user research…
query-datasets
Answer grounded yes/no questions about what exists in the 03-datasets/ example corpora (supporttickets, calltranscripts) using the local SQLite + FTS5 + vector hybrid index. Use when the user asks 'do/does [corpus] contain/mention/include/have requests for X?', 'any [corpus] about Y?', or similar factual queries over…
critique-prd
Rubric-score a PRD pack (02 + 03) against the 7-dimension PM Brain rubric and run a 4-persona panel review. Returns scores, panel critiques, the single weakest section, a concrete rewrite, and P0/P1 fix lists. Use when: PRD review, score my PRD, rubric review, panel review, rewrite weakest section, critique-prd.
create-prd
Write the PRD pack (02-product-requirements.md + 03-success-metrics.md) on top of an approved product brief. Use when: PRD, product requirements, requirements doc, success metrics, spec writeup, shape the PRD.
create-internal-feature-announcement
Drafts an internal feature announcement (IFA) from the PRD pack and user sources using the repo template, then writes 04-internal-feature-announcement.md. Use when: IFA, internal feature announcement, internal FAQ, Slack IFA prep, launch comms pack, or internal product documentation from the template.