Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to l-nmch/hailo-10h-llm-compiler. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/l-nmch/hailo-10h-llm-compiler/main/.claude/skills/device-debug/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/l-nmch/hailo-10h-llm-compilerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/l-nmch/hailo-10h-llm-compiler/device-debug)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/l-nmch/hailo-10h-llm-compiler/device-debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/l-nmch/hailo-10h-llm-compiler/device-debug/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/l-nmch/hailo-10h-llm-compiler/device-debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/l-nmch/hailo-10h-llm-compiler/device-debug.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.01069 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00535 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00214 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
device-debug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Device-side debugging playbook
The most common trap in this project: a generic client-side error
(HAILO_TIMEOUT, a hang, a vague failure code) hides a specific,
immediately-legible error that only exists in the device's own logs.
Chasing client-visible symptoms (file size, PCIe throughput, retry logic)
before checking device-side logs has cost real time more than once — check
this first, not last.
Why the client alone can lie to you
The Hailo-10H runs its own firmware with an embedded mini-Linux (visible
in dmesg as u-boot-spl.bin / fitImage / image-fs loaded by the PCIe
driver at boot). The "server" side of any client/server exchange
(hailort.log talks about "sending N chunks to server") is that firmware,
not a host process. It can fail immediately and specifically, then have
its own generic timeout/error path fire seconds later — which is the
only thing the client ever reports. If you only read the client log, you
are debugging the echo, not the cause.
The technique
hailortcli logs runtime # LLM/inference server logs — start here
hailortcli logs system_control # control-plane / configuration logs
hailortcli logs nnc # neural network core logs
Run this immediately after a failure, before forming hypotheses from client-side symptoms alone. Look for the first CHECK/error line, not the last — the device's own error-reporting path can itself time out and add a second, misleading failure a few seconds later.
General elimination order for opaque failures
- Device-side logs first (above) — often gives the exact failing check and file:line in one shot.
- Structural comparison against a known-good official artifact
(
hef_audit.py,parse-hef) — rules in/out the artifact itself before blaming the runtime. - Client-side logs (
HAILORT_CONSOLE_LOGGER_LEVEL=debug,hailort.log) — timing and chunking, useful once you know what to look for. - Version alignment — driver, HailoRT, and server packages must come from the same software-suite drop; mixed versions fail in confusing ways. Check all three before deep-diving logic.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +13 lines ed29ea80c96c
- 10d ago First seen · 73 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 95c48dafa2b4
device-debug is a skill published in the GitHub repository l-nmch/hailo-10h-llm-compiler (14 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,069 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
trulens-instrumentation
Instrument LLM apps with TruLens OTEL-based tracing - from setup to debugging and optimization.
trulens-diagnosis
Diagnose low evaluation scores and generate actionable improvement recommendations.
bug-reproducer
Find likely software bugs in a codebase, rank concrete bug candidates, and prove or reject them with focused regression tests before proposing a fix. Also turn bug reports, stack traces, screenshots, failing behavior, support tickets, and regressions into minimal reproducible cases with red-to-green evidence. Use when…
refactoring-safely
Change the structure of code that already exists without changing what it does: smells as triggers, the named transformations (extract/inline, move feature, organise data, simplify conditionals), and above all the workflow that makes it safe — characterization tests first, one transformation at a time, green between…
code-complexity
Keep each unit comprehensible while the code grows: deep modules over shallow ones, information hiding, honest names, small functions with one job, error handling that does not lose the error, DRY and orthogonality, design by contract, and not leaving broken windows. Merges module-complexity management with…
kicad-review
Design review and validation workflow for KiCAD projects via MCP tools. Triggers on: "review my design", "check for errors", "audit", "DRC", "ERC", "find problems", "design review", "is this ready", "validate", "check my schematic", "check my PCB", "what's wrong", "run checks", "pre-fab review".