Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lacerbi/dotclaude --skill taskgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lacerbi/dotclaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lacerbi/dotclaude/task)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lacerbi/dotclaude/task"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lacerbi/dotclaude/task/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lacerbi/dotclaude/task"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lacerbi/dotclaude/task.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00866 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00346 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00087 |
Grade A, and why
task scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Task
$ARGUMENTS
Your Instructions
1. Use Existing Plan or Create Task Plan
If a PLAN file was provided or mentioned (e.g., from a prior /plan command) with structured phases, it is your working document — do not create a separate TASK file.
Never replace or condense a PLAN file. It is the user's reviewed work product: goals, file references, verification details, rationale. Add tracking to it in place — convert implementation bullets to checkboxes (- Item → - [ ] Item), append new items or sections as gaps appear, update status markers as you progress — so that the checkboxes sit alongside the existing prose, never instead of it. An edit that removes more text than it adds is almost certainly wrong.
If no suitable PLAN file exists, create a markdown file TASK_[descriptor]_[timestamp].md containing:
- Task description
- Checklist of specific steps/subtasks
- Success criteria
- Any dependencies or prerequisites
Keep it brief: one concise line per item, links to files instead of explanations ([config](./src/config.js)). This is a tracking tool, not documentation.
Status markers:
[ ]Not started[~]In progress[x]Complete[!]Blocked or needs attention
2. Execute While Updating
Update the checklist after every significant action — [~] when starting an item, [x] when done, [!] on blockers — and add subtasks as they surface. The file is the live record: sessions crash mid-run, and anyone (including a fresh session) must be able to read current progress from the file alone. Keep notes extremely brief or link to files.
3. Completion Expectations
Complete the full task/plan. Do not skip items, defer work, or stop halfway; minor deviations and unexpected issues are normal — handle them and continue. Stop early only for an overwhelming reason (core assumptions fundamentally wrong, blocking dependencies unresolvable).
When finished, the file shows the final status of all items, any unresolved issues (with explanation if incomplete), and a brief completion summary.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -23 lines 09f0490819b6
- 1mo ago First seen · 88 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 82277725734a
task is a skill published in the GitHub repository lacerbi/dotclaude (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 866 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
grooming-sprint-tasks
Grooms sprint tasks by cross-referencing Monday.com board with GitHub issues across multiple repos, then produces subitems, descriptions, linked issues, and SP estimates. Use when grooming a sprint, planning sprint tasks, preparing for sprint planning, or when user says "groom", "sprint planning", "cross-reference…
process-mapper
Use when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being…
strategic-alignment
Cascades strategy from boardroom to individual contributor. Detects and fixes misalignment between company goals and team execution. Covers strategy articulation, cascade mapping, orphan goal detection, silo identification, communication gap analysis, and realignment protocols. Use when teams are pulling in different…
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
feature-prioritisation
Aplica marcos de priorización (RICE, MoSCoW, Kano, ICE, Opportunity Scoring) para clasificar características e items del backlog. Úsalo cuando se te pida priorizar características, clasificar un backlog, decidir qué construir a continuación, o evaluar compensaciones entre ideas competidoras. Produce una lista de…
design-handoff-brief
Transform feature briefs into structured design briefs that give designers the context they need before opening Figma. Use when asked to write a design brief, create a design handoff, brief a designer on a new feature, or translate a PRD into design requirements. Produces a brief with user goal, emotional context…