Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lacvietanh/akidevrule --skill akilintgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lacvietanh/akidevruleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lacvietanh/akidevrule/akilint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lacvietanh/akidevrule/akilint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lacvietanh/akidevrule/akilint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lacvietanh/akidevrule/akilint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lacvietanh/akidevrule/akilint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00114 | $0.00624 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00057 | $0.00312 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00125 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
akilint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
akilint — penalty-card lint
Runs the shared detector — never a model sweep for what a grep settles:
python3 ~/.claude/skills/akiflow/scripts/scythe.py <file|dir> [...] # on other CLIs: the same path under that CLI's skills root
The script is the SSoT for these detectors — akiflow's aki-conduct seat runs the same one, so a card name means the same thing everywhere. Exit code: 0 clean, 1 findings — usable from CI or hooks without parsing.
Scope — what the script can and cannot claim
[WRAP]— a logical line split across physical lines: a 2-line comment whose second line reads as a lowercase continuation, or a markdown prose line broken mid-sentence. Root rule:agent.C3.[YAP]— a comment block ≥3 lines, or a comment line >200 chars. Always labeled (review): a flag for judgment againstcoding.B4, never an auto-delete verdict — a legitimate long WHY exists andagent.C3forbids wrapping it, so length alone convicts nothing.[FLUFF](density,agent.A4) is content understanding — a script cannot check it and this skill never claims it.
Protocol
- Run scythe on the paths in scope. Default scope = the files this session touched or the paths the user named; a repo-wide sweep is proposed in one line first, not assumed (
agent.B1). - Report the findings verbatim — they are already dense coordinates; do not re-narrate them.
- Fix
[WRAP]findings directly: rejoining is mechanical (agent.C3) — but honor C3's atomic-line cautions: never merge frontmatter fields, one-per-line directives, or any line something parses. - Judge each
[YAP]finding againstcoding.B4before touching it: fix the name/shape first, delete second, keep a genuine WHY (or move an oversize rationale to a doc and leave the reference,docs.B3). State in one line what was kept and why. - False positives (a legitimate docblock, a keyword list): name them as such in the report — do not silently skip, and do not "fix" them.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 30 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A a1815ee28aff
akilint is a skill published in the GitHub repository lacvietanh/akidevrule (9 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 624 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
starfleet-tasks
Task capture, task lifecycle, dashboard topics, and reports via starfleetctl. Load when capturing, working on, or reporting a task, and for all dashboard access.
starfleet-timer
Set timers instead of blocking a session with sleep/watch-loops (e.g. waiting for a GitHub Actions run): the timer fires a comms directive into the fleet at the scheduled time, and the poller injects it into the owning ship's next turn — no background process, no blocking, survives a session restart.
starfleet
Fleet coordination core — comms, board status, concurrency/isolation, and pointers to the themed starfleet- skills. Load when handling inter-ship messages, checking the board, or unsure which starfleet skill applies.
starfleet-github
GitHub PR/CI/backport interaction via starfleetctl (read-only + mutating commands, PR claims, backports). Load when checking PR status/CI, claiming a PR branch, submitting or repairing a PR, or backporting.
starfleet-sessions
Ship session and workspace management — spawning ships, session attach/stop, git worktrees, web console, deployment. Load when launching/administering ships or managing the fleet web console.
doubt-driven-review
In-flight adversarial check on a non-trivial decision BEFORE it stands — distinct from post-hoc review of a finished diff. Use on "stress-test this decision", "are we sure about this", "verify before commit", "poke holes in this", when working in unfamiliar code, or before an irreversible step (migration, prod deploy…