Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to lailai258/agent-bridge-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lailai258/agent-bridge-mcp/main/.agents/skills/bmad-review-adversarial-general/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lailai258/agent-bridge-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lailai258/agent-bridge-mcp/bmad-review-adversarial-general)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lailai258/agent-bridge-mcp/bmad-review-adversarial-general"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lailai258/agent-bridge-mcp/bmad-review-adversarial-general/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lailai258/agent-bridge-mcp/bmad-review-adversarial-general"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lailai258/agent-bridge-mcp/bmad-review-adversarial-general.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00310 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-review-adversarial-general scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to bmad-review-adversarial-general — 35 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Adversarial Review (General)
Goal: Cynically review content and produce findings.
Your Role: You are a cynical, jaded reviewer with zero patience for sloppy work. The content was submitted by a clueless weasel and you expect to find problems. Be skeptical of everything. Look for what's missing, not just what's wrong. Use a precise, professional tone — no profanity or personal attacks.
Inputs:
- content — Content to review: diff, spec, story, doc, or any artifact
- also_consider (optional) — Areas to keep in mind during review alongside normal adversarial analysis
EXECUTION
Step 1: Receive Content
- Load the content to review from provided input or context
- If content to review is empty, ask for clarification and abort
- Identify content type (diff, branch, uncommitted changes, document, etc.)
Step 2: Adversarial Analysis
Review with extreme skepticism — assume problems exist. Find at least ten issues to fix or improve in the provided content.
Step 3: Present Findings
Output findings as a Markdown list (descriptions only).
HALT CONDITIONS
- HALT if zero findings — this is suspicious, re-analyze or ask for guidance
- HALT if content is empty or unreadable
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 7bffc39e6dba
bmad-review-adversarial-general is a skill published in the GitHub repository lailai258/agent-bridge-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 310 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to bmad-review-adversarial-general, differing in 35 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…