Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/editnpx skills add Lambenthan/empiricalwiki --skill editgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lambenthan/empiricalwikiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/edit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/edit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/edit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00445 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00222 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
edit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/edit
根据用户要求增删 raw sources 或更新 wiki 内容。
触发
用户手动：/edit <用户要求>
输入
用户请求，例如：
- "把这篇论文下载到 raw/papers/"
- "删除 raw/papers/xxx.pdf"
- "更新 topics/efficient-llm-adaptation 的 SOTA tracker"
- "给 concepts/lora 加一个新变体"
输出
更新后的 wiki 文件、index.md、log.md
步骤
STEP 1: 解析用户意图
- 增加 raw sources：
- 若用户提供了本地路径：复制到
raw/对应目录 - 若用户提供了 arXiv URL：下载到
raw/papers/ - 若用户提供了网页 URL：用 markdownify 抓取内容存到
raw/web/
- 若用户提供了本地路径：复制到
- 删除 raw sources：
- 确认后执行删除
- 更新 wiki：
- 读取相关页面，按用户要求修改内容
STEP 2: 执行更新
- 增加的 raw sources 后续可通过
/ingest纳入 wiki - 直接 wiki 修改：按用户指令更新特定页面的特定字段/内容
- 写正向链接时同步写反向链接
STEP 3: 更新导航
EDIT wiki/index.md：更新相关条目APPEND wiki/log.md：## [{date}] update | {description}
STEP 4: 报告
- 列出变更内容
- 提示后续操作（如需要 ingest 新增的 raw sources）
约束
raw/只读（本 skill 可以往raw/添加文件，但不修改已有文件）- wiki 修改遵循模板结构
- 双向链接同步维护
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 61 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 4ec2394e71c9
edit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Lambenthan/empiricalwiki (82 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 445 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-workflow
经管 / 社科实证论文全流程 meta-orchestrator：把选题、设计、数据、估计、方法闸门、 表图、写作、去 AI 味、质量门、修订、投稿与复盘编排成 Stage 0–9 可断点续跑流水线。 本 skill 不重复实现子能力，而是按阶段调用既有 skill 或并行 subagent，并在 Stage 3–4 路由 Python/StatsPAI、Stata、R 三种分析后端，Stage 9 交付一份含正文+表+图+参考文献的 Word 全文定稿（09submission/main.docx，另可出 .tex）。触发：/paper-workflow、 帮我写一篇实证论文、从选题到投稿、端到端 empirical…
chinese-documentation
中文文档排版参考——中英文空格、全半角标点、术语保留、链接格式、中文文案排版指北约定。仅在用户显式 /chinese-documentation 时调用，不要根据上下文自动触发。.
seven-pass-review
Mechanize Pattern 15 — the seven-pass adversarial review protocol for academic manuscripts. Spawns 7 forked subagents in parallel (abstract, intro, methods, results, robustness, prose, citations), then synthesizes a prioritized revision checklist. Use for submission-ready or R&R-stage papers where single-pass review…
slide-excellence
Multi-agent comprehensive slide review (visual + pedagogy + proofreading, plus TikZ / parity / substance conditionally). Use when user says "full review", "excellence pass", "comprehensive check", "review everything", "pre-release review", "slide excellence", or before teaching / shipping a deck. Fanout wrapper — for…
triage-inbox
Triage academic email and calendar (Gmail / Google Calendar via the session's MCP) into a prioritized digest plus a referee-obligations tracker — classifying referee requests, R&R and editor correspondence, co-author threads, seminar and conference invites, and grant/admin deadlines, and proposing a human-gated action…
scaffold-exercises
Scaffold a graded problem set with sections, problems, worked solutions, and short "why this matters" explainers across analytical, empirical, and coding types. Use when user says "make a problem set on X", "scaffold exercises for this lecture", "create practice problems", "generate homework with a solution key"…