Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Lambenthan/empiricalwiki. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Lambenthan/empiricalwiki/main/.claude/skills/paper-plan/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lambenthan/empiricalwikiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/paper-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/paper-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/paper-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/paper-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lambenthan/empiricalwiki/paper-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.04173 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02086 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00835 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00417 |
Grade A, and why
paper-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 403 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/paper-plan
从 wiki 的 claim graph 编译论文大纲。 输入 target claims(status: supported 或 weakly_supported),指定目标会议/期刊, 从 wiki 编译 evidence map → 确定叙事结构 → 生成章节大纲 + figure plan + citation plan。 Review LLM review 是必选步骤(作为 area chair 审查大纲说服力)。 输出 PAPER_PLAN.md 到 wiki/outputs/。
关键差异:大纲由 claim graph 驱动 — 每个 section 存在是因为它支撑某个 claim, 而非因为论文惯例要求有该 section。
Inputs
claims:目标 claims 的 slug 列表(空格分隔)- 每个 claim 应为
supported或weakly_supported状态 - 若包含
proposed或challenged状态的 claim,发出警告但继续
- 每个 claim 应为
--venue(必选):目标会议/期刊,决定页数限制和格式要求- 支持:
ICLR/NeurIPS/ICML/ACL/CVPR/IEEE
- 支持:
--title(可选):工作标题,若不提供则从 target claim 生成
Outputs
wiki/outputs/paper-plan-{slug}-{date}.md— 完整论文计划(PAPER_PLAN.md)wiki/graph/edges.jsonl— 新增 derived_from 边(plan → source claims/papers)wiki/graph/context_brief.md— 重建wiki/log.md— 追加日志- PAPER_PLAN_REPORT(输出到终端)— 计划摘要
Wiki Interaction
Reads
wiki/claims/*.md— 目标 claims 的 status、confidence、evidence 列表、conditionswiki/experiments/*.md— claims 的 supporting experiments(结果、metrics、key_result)wiki/papers/*.md— evidence 来源论文(Method、Results、Related)wiki/concepts/*.md— 涉及的技术概念(支持 Method 章节撰写)wiki/topics/*.md— 研究方向上下文(支持 Introduction 定位)wiki/ideas/*.md— 原始 idea 的 motivation 和 hypothesiswiki/graph/context_brief.md— 全局上下文wiki/graph/open_questions.md— 知识缺口(标注论文 limitation)wiki/graph/edges.jsonl— 关系图谱(构建叙事逻辑链).claude/skills/shared-references/academic-writing.md— 写作原则.claude/skills/shared-references/citation-verification.md— 引用纪律
Writes
wiki/outputs/paper-plan-{slug}-{date}.md— 论文计划文件wiki/graph/edges.jsonl— derived_from 边wiki/graph/context_brief.md— 重建wiki/log.md— 追加操作日志
Graph edges created
derived_from:paper-plan → claims(计划从哪些 claims 派生)derived_from:paper-plan → papers(计划引用哪些论文)
Workflow
前置:确认工作目录为 wiki 项目根(包含 wiki/、raw/、tools/ 的目录)。
Step 1: 加载 Claim Graph
- 读取所有 target claims 的
wiki/claims/{slug}.md - 对每个 claim,收集其 evidence 列表:
- 每条 evidence 的 source(paper slug 或 experiment slug)
- evidence type(supports / contradicts / tested_by / invalidates)
- evidence strength(weak / moderate / strong)
- 对每条 evidence source,读取对应的 wiki 页面:
wiki/experiments/{source}.md→ key_result、metrics、outcomewiki/papers/{source}.md→ Method、Results
- 从
wiki/graph/edges.jsonl加载相关边,构建 claims 之间的关系 - 读取
wiki/graph/context_brief.md获取全局上下文 - 读取
wiki/graph/open_questions.md标注 known limitations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 403 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 7c6730c1637a
paper-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository Lambenthan/empiricalwiki (82 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 4,173 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-workflow
A staged workflow for producing an evidence-based economics or social-science research paper, from choosing a topic through submission. It coordinates existing tools and analysis options, including Python, Stata, and R.
chinese-documentation
A Chinese technical-documentation style guide covering spacing, punctuation, numbers, terminology, and links when Chinese and English appear together.
seven-pass-review
Mechanize Pattern 15 — the seven-pass adversarial review protocol for academic manuscripts. Spawns 7 forked subagents in parallel (abstract, intro, methods, results, robustness, prose, citations), then synthesizes a prioritized revision checklist. Use for submission-ready or R&R-stage papers where single-pass review…
slide-excellence
Multi-agent comprehensive slide review (visual + pedagogy + proofreading, plus TikZ / parity / substance conditionally). Use when user says "full review", "excellence pass", "comprehensive check", "review everything", "pre-release review", "slide excellence", or before teaching / shipping a deck. Fanout wrapper — for…
scaffold-exercises
Scaffold a graded problem set with sections, problems, worked solutions, and short "why this matters" explainers across analytical, empirical, and coding types. Use when user says "make a problem set on X", "scaffold exercises for this lecture", "create practice problems", "generate homework with a solution key"…
triage-inbox
Triage academic email and calendar (Gmail / Google Calendar via the session's MCP) into a prioritized digest plus a referee-obligations tracker — classifying referee requests, R&R and editor correspondence, co-author threads, seminar and conference invites, and grant/admin deadlines, and proposing a human-gated action…