Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LandonSchropp/agent-toolkit --skill github-issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LandonSchropp/agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/landonschropp/agent-toolkit/github-issue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/landonschropp/agent-toolkit/github-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/landonschropp/agent-toolkit/github-issue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/landonschropp/agent-toolkit/github-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/landonschropp/agent-toolkit/github-issue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.01260 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00504 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00252 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00126 |
Grade A, and why
github-issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitHub Issue
Check It Isn't Already Handled
Search both, since a repository that routes features to discussions won't have them among its issues:
gh issue list --repo <owner>/<repo> --search "<terms>" --state all
gh discussion list --repo <owner>/<repo> --search "<terms>" --state all
Then confirm the thing being asked for doesn't already exist, which is a different question from whether it's been reported. Check the README, the changelog, and the tool's own --help.
Any hit ends the task. Tell the user what you found, with a link where there is one, and let them decide.
Follow The Repository's Template
Maintainers wrote the template so reports arrive in a shape they can triage, and inventing a structure instead is the fastest way to get an issue closed. Before writing anything, find out what the repository expects, using gh api repos/<owner>/<repo>/contents/<path> when there's no local checkout:
- List
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/for issue forms and Markdown templates, and check the legacy.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md. - Read
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml.blank_issues_enabled: falsemeans the maintainers expect one of the listed templates, andcontact_linksmay route this kind of report somewhere else entirely. - Check whether the repository routes this kind of report to discussions instead. The deciding evidence is
contact_linksorCONTRIBUTING.md, notgh repo view <owner>/<repo> --json hasDiscussionsEnabledon its own, since plenty of repositories enable discussions and still take feature requests as issues. When they do route it, look for a matching form in.github/DISCUSSION_TEMPLATE/, draft a discussion, and say so when presenting it for review. - Read
CONTRIBUTING.md.
Fill in every field the chosen template asks for, and delete nothing but its instructional comments. A Markdown template keeps its headings and their order. A YAML issue form has no headings of its own: each field's label becomes a ### <label> heading, in the file's order, and every required: true field must be answered. When several templates could fit, ask the user which one.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 24d ago Changed · +3 lines 1d4062309026
- 29d ago Changed · +3 lines 8589dd253024
- 1mo ago First seen · 76 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 9e5ce17512be
github-issue is a skill published in the GitHub repository LandonSchropp/agent-toolkit (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,260 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
git-issue-create
Open one standalone GitHub issue with gh - duplicate-checked first, conventional title, repo-template-aware body, auto-resolved labels. Use for every issue-filing request however casual: "open an issue", "file a bug", "make a ticket", "/git-issue-create", "track this", "note this down", "we should fix X later", or…
git-issue-triage
Groom an open GitHub backlog with gh - one read-only sweep, every open issue bucketed into exactly one category (unlabeled, unprioritized, stale, likely duplicate, closeable, blocked, healthy), a per-issue report, per-category confirmation, then batched label / state / comment edits. Use when the user says "triage…
git-issue-start
Take a GitHub issue from open to a checked-out branch - assign it to you, mark it in progress if the repo has such a label, derive a conventional branch name from its type: label, branch off the detected base. Use for "start issue 42", "work on #42", "/git-issue-start 42", "let's do 42", "pick up that issue", "take…
setup
Configure this repo's issue tracker for the flow skills: GitHub, Jira, or local markdown (the default).
issue-driven-delivery
Run implementation work from a tracked issue with explicit scope, branch intent, validation steps, and closeout evidence.
conductor-revert
Git-aware undo by logical work unit (track, phase, or task).