Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/lanes-sh/app/github-lanes-bridgenpx skills add lanes-sh/app --skill github-lanes-bridgegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lanes-sh/appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lanes-sh/app/github-lanes-bridge)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lanes-sh/app/github-lanes-bridge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lanes-sh/app/github-lanes-bridge.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00161 | $0.02573 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00081 | $0.01287 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00515 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00257 |
Grade A, and why
github-lanes-bridge scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 165 lines · 161 tokens per session scan A d28639de89a9
github-lanes-bridge is a skill published in the GitHub repository lanes-sh/app (264 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 161 tokens to every session and 2,573 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
conductor-setup
Scaffolds the project and sets up the Conductor environment. Use this whenever a project needs to be initialized or if the Conductor configuration is missing.
conductor-new-track
Plans a new track (feature or bug fix), generates spec/plan documents, and updates the registry.
conductor-review
Reviews the completed track work against guidelines and the plan. Acts as a Principal Software Engineer to ensure quality and compliance.
mantis-reproduce
Generates and runs crash reproducers to verify security flaws. Use when viable findings exist and you need to write and execute a script or payload to verify the crash. Don't use for code auditing or patching.
mantis-calibrate
Calculates the final risk score based on empirical evidence and architectural impact. Use when findings have been fully processed by previous stages and you need to append final risk scores to the finding files. Don't use for discovering new vulnerabilities or writing patches.
mantis-structural-index
Builds a content-addressed semantic-unit index from source code for structural context. Use when a pinned or live codebase is available and structural cross-reference data would improve research quality. Don't use for findings analysis, patching, or reporting.