Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lanes-sh/app --skill setup-lanes-linkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lanes-sh/appWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lanes-sh/app/setup-lanes-link)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lanes-sh/app/setup-lanes-link"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lanes-sh/app/setup-lanes-link/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lanes-sh/app/setup-lanes-link"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lanes-sh/app/setup-lanes-link.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00137 | $0.02155 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00055 | $0.00862 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00431 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
setup-lanes-link scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 69bbb576ed7c
- 1mo ago First seen · 145 lines · 137 tokens per session scan A 3789a807d162
setup-lanes-link is a skill published in the GitHub repository lanes-sh/app (276 stars, last pushed 23d ago), with no licence file. It adds 137 tokens to every session and 2,155 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
mantis-reproduce
Generates and runs crash reproducers to verify security flaws. Use when viable findings exist and you need to write and execute a script or payload to verify the crash. Don't use for code auditing or patching.
mantis-calibrate
Calculates the final risk score based on empirical evidence and architectural impact. Use when findings have been fully processed by previous stages and you need to append final risk scores to the finding files. Don't use for discovering new vulnerabilities or writing patches.
mantis-structural-index
Builds a content-addressed semantic-unit index from source code for structural context. Use when a pinned or live codebase is available and structural cross-reference data would improve research quality. Don't use for findings analysis, patching, or reporting.
mantis-plan
Formulates a targeted defensive security reviewing plan based on the active threat model and historical learnings. Use when starting a security review campaign to map the codebase boundaries and generate a roadmap (workspace/plan.json). Don't use for executing code reviews, writing test scripts, or patching code.
mantis-report
Generates a human-readable security review packet compiled from confirmed findings and exploit chains. Use at the end of a review cycle to produce stakeholder-facing documentation. Don't use for auditing code or verifying patches directly.
mantis-researcher
Audits production source code files based on the strategy in workspace/plan.json. Use when a review plan exists and you need to perform static analysis and deep-dive reviews of targeted files. Don't use for planning, deduplicating, or writing patches.