skills-benchmarks is a test suite that measures how the design of skill documentation affects Claude Code's adherence to recommended coding patterns. It is used to compare documentation approaches across LangChain-related tasks and other agent workflows. Its catalogue entries represent skills, hooks, instructions, and a plugin used in the benchmark project.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add langchain-ai/skills-benchmarks --skill langchain-oss-primergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/langchain-ai/skills-benchmarksWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/langchain-ai/skills-benchmarks/langchain-oss-primer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/langchain-ai/skills-benchmarks/langchain-oss-primer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/langchain-ai/skills-benchmarks/langchain-oss-primer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/langchain-ai/skills-benchmarks/langchain-oss-primer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/langchain-ai/skills-benchmarks/langchain-oss-primer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.04110 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.02055 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00822 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00411 |
Grade A, and why
langchain-oss-primer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 403 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
It answers three questions every project must resolve upfront:
- Which framework? — LangChain, LangGraph, or Deep Agents
- Which agent archetype? — maps your use case to the right API and patterns
- What to install and which skills to load next
Load this skill first. Once you've decided on a framework and agent type, follow the "Next Skills" section at the bottom — it tells you exactly which skills to invoke next based on your choices.
Step 1 — Pick Your Framework
The three frameworks are layered, not competing. Each builds on the one below:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Deep Agents │ ← batteries included
│ (planning, memory, skills, files) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ LangGraph │ ← custom orchestration
│ (nodes, edges, state, persistence) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ LangChain │ ← foundation
│ (models, tools, prompts, RAG) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
Answer these questions in order:
| Question | Yes → | No → |
|---|---|---|
| User needs or wants planning, persistent memory, complex task management, long-running tasks, out-of-the-box file management, on-demand skills, or built-in middleware, subagents, easy expansion capabilities? | Deep Agents | ↓ |
| Needs custom control flow — specified loops, branching, deterministic parallel workers, or manually instrumented human-in-the-loop? | LangGraph | ↓ |
| Single-purpose agent with a fixed set of tools? | LangChain (create_agent) |
↓ |
| Simple prompt pipeline or retrieval chain with no agent loop? | LangChain (direct model / chain) | — |
Higher layers depend on lower ones only when necessary — you can mix them. A LangGraph graph can be a subagent inside Deep Agents; LangChain tools work inside both.
| LangChain | LangGraph | Deep Agents | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control flow | Fixed (tool loop) | Custom (graph) | Managed (middleware) |
| Middleware | Callbacks only | ✗ None | ✓ Explicit, configurable |
| Planning | ✗ | Manual | ✓ TodoListMiddleware |
| File management | ✗ | Manual | ✓ FilesystemMiddleware |
| Persistent memory | ✗ | With checkpointer | ✓ MemoryMiddleware |
| Subagent delegation | ✗ | Manual | ✓ SubAgentMiddleware |
| On-demand skills | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ SkillsMiddleware |
| Human-in-the-loop | ✗ | Manual interrupt | ✓ HumanInTheLoopMiddleware |
| Custom graph edges | ✗ | ✓ Full control | Limited |
| Setup complexity | Low | Medium | Low |
Middleware is a concept specific to Deep Agents (explicit middleware layer). LangGraph has no middleware — behavior is wired directly into nodes and edges. If a user asks for built-in hooks or automatic middleware, route to Deep Agents.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 403 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 270926f65251
langchain-oss-primer is a skill published in the GitHub repository langchain-ai/skills-benchmarks (116 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 4,110 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-platform-rag-engine-management
Manage and query Agent Platform RAG Engine Corpora and retrieve grounded contexts using the Google GenAI SDK. Use when listing RAG corpora or files, inspecting a corpus, retrieving contexts, or generating content grounded in a RAG corpus. Do not use for standard database queries (use SQL/Spanner skills), Google…
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog
Discovers requirements and generates guidance to design and deploy a governed, secure agentic-analytics solution for data that's distributed across Google Cloud, other cloud providers, or on-premises. Data that's outside Google Cloud (such as data from Databricks, Snowflake, Salesforce, SAP, or Oracle systems) is…
training-check
Interactively monitor training metrics from the current Codex session, periodically checking WandB or fallback logs for NaN, divergence, plateaus, and broken runs.
nemo-automodel-launcher-config
Configure NeMo AutoModel job launches for interactive runs, Slurm clusters, and SkyPilot cloud execution.