Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to langgenius/dify. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/langgenius/dify/main/.agents/skills/frontend-testing/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/langgenius/difyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/langgenius/dify/frontend-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/langgenius/dify/frontend-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/langgenius/dify/frontend-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/langgenius/dify/frontend-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/langgenius/dify/frontend-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.00193 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00077 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00039 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00019 |
Grade A, and why
frontend-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -3 lines 3f0cdc9657b9
- 2mo ago First seen · 17 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 505625ce9726
frontend-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository langgenius/dify (159,851 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 193 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-prs
Review a GitHub pull request in the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo against the team's reviewer checklist: PR title/description conventions, linked issue, logic errors and unhandled edge cases, breaking changes, test coverage, docs updates, security (input handling), and new dependencies. Use whenever a maintainer asks…
credit-note-fixer
Fix the tiny credit-note formatting bug and rerun the exact targeted test command.
langbot-testing
Test LangBot WebUI and core product flows with an automated browser and backend logs. Use when validating the configured LangBot frontend, pipeline Debug Chat, model provider setup and test buttons, bot and knowledge-base UI flows, or troubleshooting failed LangBot end-to-end tests.
qa-review
QA review for code changes — test coverage analysis, edge case identification, test plan generation, regression detection, test health tracking over time.
writing-skills
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment.
code-review-expert
Expert code review of current git changes with a senior engineer lens. Detects SOLID violations, security risks, and proposes actionable improvements.