Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh --skill zh-code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh/zh-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh/zh-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh/zh-code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh/zh-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh/zh-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00371 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00148 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
zh-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
中文代码审查专家
触发条件
当用户要求审查代码、code review、代码检查、代码质量评估时激活此技能。
工作流程
- 读取目标文件 — 使用 Glob 和 Read 工具获取要审查的代码
- 分析代码质量 — 从以下维度评估：
- 代码规范（命名、格式、注释）
- 潜在 Bug（空指针、越界、并发问题）
- 性能问题（N+1 查询、内存泄漏、不必要的循环）
- 安全漏洞（SQL 注入、XSS、硬编码密钥）
- 设计模式（是否合理使用、是否有更好的方案）
- 生成审查报告 — 使用中文输出结构化报告
输出格式
## 📋 代码审查报告
### 📊 总体评分：X/10
### 🔴 严重问题（必须修复）
- [文件:行号] 问题描述
💡 修复建议：...
### 🟡 建议改进（推荐修复）
- [文件:行号] 问题描述
💡 改进建议：...
### 🟢 亮点
- 做得好的地方
### 📝 总结
一段总结性评价
注意事项
- 技术术语保留英文（如 null pointer、SQL injection）
- 代码示例保持原语言
- 对于中文变量名/注释，也要检查是否恰当
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 48 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A b7ec773f213d
zh-code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository laolaoshiren/claude-code-skills-zh (899 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 371 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
design-smell-review
Lightweight design smell review for modules and APIs—coupling, cohesion, naming, boundaries, and unnecessary complexity. Use before large refactors or when code feels hard to change. Complements gstack/review (diff-focused).
github-comment-triage
Triage and address GitHub PR review comments systematically—classify, respond, fix or defer with rationale. Use when a PR has review feedback, requested changes, or unresolved threads.
code-simplification
Simplify working code while preserving behavior—remove dead paths, flatten nesting, clarify names, reduce duplication. Use after features work but code feels over-engineered.
doubt-driven-review
Adversarial fresh-context review for non-trivial decisions before they stand. Use for production-impacting logic, security-sensitive changes, unfamiliar code, or high-blast-radius architecture choices.
swing-review
An adversarial review guide for deliberately looking for hidden flaws in code, system designs, pull requests, and important decisions. A pull request is a proposed code change awaiting review.
ai-engineering-toolkit
6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.