Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add latestaiagents/agent-skills --skill refactor-with-aigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/latestaiagents/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/latestaiagents/agent-skills/refactor-with-ai)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/latestaiagents/agent-skills/refactor-with-ai"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/latestaiagents/agent-skills/refactor-with-ai/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/latestaiagents/agent-skills/refactor-with-ai"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/latestaiagents/agent-skills/refactor-with-ai.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.01854 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00927 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00371 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00185 |
Grade A, and why
refactor-with-ai scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 323 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Refactor with AI
Safely refactor code with AI assistance while preserving behavior.
When to Use
- Cleaning up messy or complex code
- Extracting reusable functions/components
- Modernizing legacy patterns
- Reducing cyclomatic complexity
- Applying design patterns
- Preparing code for new features
The Safe Refactoring Process
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. CHARACTERIZE - Understand current │
│ behavior with tests │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. IDENTIFY - Find specific smells │
│ and improvement opportunities │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 3. REFACTOR - Small, incremental │
│ changes with AI assistance │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 4. VERIFY - Tests still pass, │
│ behavior unchanged │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
Step 1: Characterize with Tests
Before ANY refactoring, ensure behavior is captured.
// If no tests exist, create characterization tests
describe('OrderProcessor (characterization)', () => {
it('processes valid order', () => {
const result = processor.process(validOrder);
// Capture current behavior, even if not ideal
expect(result).toMatchSnapshot();
});
it('handles edge cases', () => {
expect(processor.process(null)).toBeNull();
expect(processor.process(emptyOrder)).toEqual({ status: 'empty' });
});
});
Step 2: Identify Code Smells
Common Smells to Look For
| Smell | Sign | Refactoring |
|---|---|---|
| Long Method | >20 lines | Extract Method |
| Long Parameter List | >3 params | Introduce Parameter Object |
| Duplicate Code | Copy-paste | Extract and reuse |
| Nested Conditionals | >3 levels deep | Guard clauses, early return |
| Feature Envy | Uses other class's data | Move method |
| Data Clumps | Same params together | Create class/type |
| Primitive Obsession | Strings for everything | Value objects |
| Switch Statements | Type checking | Polymorphism |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 323 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 461e6913cf82
refactor-with-ai is a skill published in the GitHub repository latestaiagents/agent-skills (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 1,854 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
fw-review
Full Freshworks marketplace app review — iparams, frontend, serverless, FDK, security, and structured text report output — in one skill.
codebase-sync
Convention discovery and rule generation from codebase analysis. Scans project structure, builds search indexes, identifies patterns, and generates enforceable rules.
code-review-patterns
Multi-dimensional code assessment across security, quality, performance, and maintainability with confidence-gated reporting (>=80%) and Router Contract generation.
subagent-driven-development
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session. Dispatches fresh subagent per task.
reviewing-changes
Use when a review package asks you to review a plan step's change set (todo.startReview): you are the REVIEWER, not the author. How to judge an agent-written diff, file findings with addreviewcomment, and settle with exactly one reviewverdict.
goga-review-plan
Verify execution plan completeness and correctness.