Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lawchat-oss/taiwan-legal-plugin --skill judgment-searchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lawchat-oss/taiwan-legal-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawchat-oss/taiwan-legal-plugin/judgment-search)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawchat-oss/taiwan-legal-plugin/judgment-search"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lawchat-oss/taiwan-legal-plugin/judgment-search/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawchat-oss/taiwan-legal-plugin/judgment-search"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lawchat-oss/taiwan-legal-plugin/judgment-search.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00123 | $0.01590 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.00795 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00318 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
judgment-search scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/taiwan-legal:judgment-search
Searches Taiwan's open judgment database and returns structured results or full text.
Audience
Legal researchers, attorneys, paralegals, in-house counsel, and law students working in or with the Taiwanese legal system. Assumes familiarity with Taiwan court structure (最高法院 / 高等法院 / 地方法院 / 行政法院 / 智慧財產及商業法院) and the 字號 case-ID convention. Not designed for end-consumers seeking legal advice.
Instructions
-
Load practice profile. Read
~/.claude/plugins/config/taiwan-legal-plugin/taiwan-legal/CLAUDE.mdfor the user's default court levels, date windows, and citation style. If the file does not exist, say: "Run/taiwan-legal:cold-start-interviewfirst to set defaults — or shall I proceed with no defaults?" -
Scope check. Before running the tool, confirm the request falls inside scope (see "What this skill does NOT do" below). If the user is asking for a legal opinion, prediction, or recommendation on a case → do not silently produce one; surface the limitation and offer a research-only path instead.
-
Identify intent from the user's query.
- "search" / keyword / topic → use
search_judgments(keyword, court, date_range, ...)from thetaiwan-legal-dbMCP server. - 字號 given / "read full text" → use
get_judgment(jid=...). - URL given → use
get_judgment(url=...). - Ambiguous → ask which the user wants.
- "search" / keyword / topic → use
-
Execute the MCP tool call with profile defaults applied only when the user did not specify (e.g., default court level, default date range). Explicit user-provided values override defaults.
-
Apply confidence bands (see below) when characterizing results.
-
Present results.
- Search results: tabular — case ID (字號), court, division (民/刑/行), date, cause (案由), URL.
- Full text: render the structured fields (主文, 事實, 理由, 引用法條) without summarization unless the user asks. For excerpts, quote verbatim with the citation attached.
-
Cite faithfully. Every claim attributed to a judgment must include 字號 + 法院 + 日期 + URL. Do not paraphrase legal holdings without quoting the operative text.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 101 lines · 123 tokens per session scan A 45f8fc8d8765
judgment-search is a skill published in the GitHub repository lawchat-oss/taiwan-legal-plugin (44 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 123 tokens to every session and 1,590 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…