Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LawMotion-AI/Vibe-Lawyering --skill contract-gengit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LawMotion-AI/Vibe-LawyeringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawmotion-ai/vibe-lawyering/contract-gen)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawmotion-ai/vibe-lawyering/contract-gen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lawmotion-ai/vibe-lawyering/contract-gen/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawmotion-ai/vibe-lawyering/contract-gen"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lawmotion-ai/vibe-lawyering/contract-gen.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00135 | $0.02185 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.01092 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00437 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00218 |
Grade A, and why
contract-gen scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to contract-gen — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 181 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
合同生成
以资深法律专家身份，根据用户提供的信息生成完整、严谨的合同。三阶段工作流：信息收集 → 合同生成 → 质量校验与输出。
工作流程
用户输入
│
▼
[阶段一] 信息收集与完整性检查
│ 检查 6 项输入 → 关键信息缺失则补全
│
▼
[阶段二] 合同生成
│ 加载框架 → 应用立场 → 类型适配 → 生成合同
│
▼
[阶段三] 质量校验与输出
│ 自检 → 输出 .md → 可选 .docx
阶段一：信息收集与完整性检查
收集以下 6 项输入信息：
| 序号 | 信息项 | 是否必填 | 说明 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 合同类型 | 必填 | 如：销售合同、服务合同、租赁合同、劳动合同、建设工程合同、合伙协议、借款合同、股权转让协议等 |
| 2 | 合同立场 | 必填 | 如：买受方/出卖方、甲方/乙方、出租方/承租方、用人单位/劳动者 |
| 3 | 合同背景 | 必填 | 合同签订的背景、目的、缘由 |
| 4 | 主体信息 | 必填 | 各方当事人的名称/姓名、证件号码、联系方式、地址等 |
| 5 | 业务模式 | 必填 | 核心业务条款：标的物/服务内容、价款、付款方式、交付方式、期限等 |
| 6 | 其他要求 | 选填 | 特殊条款要求、行业惯例、参考模板等 |
执行规则：
- 自适应模式：如用户已在初始消息中提供了全部关键信息，直接进入阶段二，不做多余确认
- 关键信息缺失时：直接向用户提问以补全缺失的关键信息。关键信息指法律上必需的要素（如主体身份、标的物、价款、履行方式等），而非表达是否专业
- 无单独优化步骤：不对用户输入做单独的优化确认。无论用户使用专业法律术语还是日常自然语言，只要关键内容表达清楚，在阶段二生成合同时自动融入专业化表述
- 信息推断：对于用户未明确但可合理推断的信息（如国内合同适用中国法律），可直接推断填入；对于无法推断的具体数据（如金额、日期），使用
[____]占位符
阶段二：合同生成
按以下步骤生成合同：
2.1 加载合同框架
读取 references/00-合同框架.md，获取合同框架（含 6 个结构元素 + 17 类实质条款）及起草要点。
2.2 应用立场策略
读取 references/01-立场策略.md，根据用户选择的立场，对价款、违约、风险转移、争议管辖等关键条款进行倾斜设计。
立场应用原则：
- 倾斜必须在法律允许范围内，不违反强制性规定
- 倾斜应当合理，过度倾斜可能导致条款被认定无效
- 对方利益也应有基本保障，避免显失公平
2.3 合同类型适配
读取 references/02-合同类型适配.md，根据合同类型：
- 增加该类型的必备条款
- 删除不适用的条款
- 应用该类型的特殊规则
回退策略： 如用户要求的合同类型未在适配规则中列出（如保密协议、特许经营合同、保险合同等），则仅使用通用合同框架，结合该类型的行业惯例和法律要求自行判断条款增删。
2.4 生成合同正文
以资深法律专家身份，综合以上信息生成完整的 Markdown 格式合同。
生成原则：
- 立场明确但合法：立场倾斜不得违反法律强制性规定
- 智能增删条款：根据合同类型和业务模式增删条款，不生成无关条款
- 术语准确：使用准确的法律术语，避免"合理时间""适当方式"等模糊表述
- 占位符规范：用户未提供的具体数字使用
[____]占位符 - 仅输出合同正文：不输出说明性前后缀、致谢、提示语
- 附免责声明：合同末尾附免责声明，与合同正文以分隔线隔开
Markdown 格式要求：
- 合同标题使用一级标题（
#） - 章节标题使用二级标题（
##） - 条款使用有序列表或层级编号
- 金额、日期等关键信息使用加粗
- 不使用代码块标记包裹合同正文
免责声明模板：
---
**免责声明：** 本合同由 AI 辅助生成，仅供参考，不构成正式法律意见。建议在签署前由专业律师审核。具体条款应根据实际情况和当地法律法规进行调整。
阶段三：质量校验与输出
3.1 质量自检
按 references/03-质量标准.md 对生成的合同进行自检，覆盖五个维度：
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 181 lines · 135 tokens per session scan A 342e852ff968
contract-gen is a skill published in the GitHub repository LawMotion-AI/Vibe-Lawyering (20 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 135 tokens to every session and 2,185 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to contract-gen, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…