Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills --skill code-security-review-openaigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/code-security-review-openai)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/code-security-review-openai"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/code-security-review-openai/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/code-security-review-openai"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills/code-security-review-openai.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.01688 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00844 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00338 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00169 |
Grade A, and why
security-review-openai scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- LICENSE.txt 11 KB
- README.md 266 B
- references/golang-general-backend-security.md 38 KB
- references/javascript-express-web-server-security.md 48 KB
- references/javascript-general-web-frontend-security.md 38 KB
- references/javascript-jquery-web-frontend-security.md 33 KB
- references/javascript-typescript-nextjs-web-server-security.md 42 KB
- references/javascript-typescript-react-web-frontend-security.md 41 KB
- references/javascript-typescript-vue-web-frontend-security.md 31 KB
- references/python-django-web-server-security.md 38 KB
- references/python-fastapi-web-server-security.md 44 KB
- references/python-flask-web-server-security.md 31 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 91 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 9f4717de8f96
security-review-openai is a skill published in the GitHub repository lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills (689 stars, last pushed 8d ago), with no licence file. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,688 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
vicious-mockery
The bard's cantrip that deals psychic damage through insults. In practice this is adversarial review — the art of finding and articulating exactly what is wrong with something in a way that is impossible to ignore. Unlike polite feedback that gets filed and forgotten, vicious mockery lands. It is the red-team report…
perception
In D&D, Perception is the raw ability to notice things: the hidden door, the faint sound, the detail that does not belong. Unlike Investigation (which follows evidence methodically) or Insight (which reads subtext), Perception is about the initial act of noticing. The real-world version is detail-catching: spotting…
review
Use when the user wants code assessed rather than changed — "review PR 88", "is this branch ready to merge?", "look over my changes", "any problems with this diff?", "give me a code review", "what do you think of this PR?", "sanity-check this branch", "ship it?". Applies to a pull request or the current branch when…
techdebt
Analyze Elixir/Phoenix technical debt — duplicates, refactoring opportunities, credo issues. Use when asked about code quality, cleanup, or what to improve.
tech-debt-ci-review
Codex adapter for deep technical-debt and CI-stability audits. Use when asked to find test theater, flaky tests, missing or mis-scoped tests, brittle CI/toolchain behavior, structural debt blocking green PRs, or a remediation order for opencode-swarm.
requesting-code-review
PRFlow's final-pass review requester, dispatched by the review engine and available directly. Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements.